Literature DB >> 8664673

The rationing agenda in the NHS. Rationing Agenda Group.

B New1.   

Abstract

The Rationing Agenda Group has been founded to deepen the British debate on rationing health care. It believes that rationing in health care is inevitable and that the public must be involved in the debate about issues relating to rationing. The group comprises people from all parts of health care, none of whom represent either their group or their institutions. RAG has begun by producing this document, which attempts to set an agenda of all the issues that need to be considered when debating the rationing of health care. We hope for responses to the document. The next stage will be to incorporate the responses into the agenda. Then RAG will divide the agenda into manageable chunks and commission expert, detailed commentaries. From this material a final paper will be published and used to prompt public debate. This stage should be reached early in 1997. While these papers are being prepared RAG is developing ways to involve the public in the debate and evaluate the whole process. We present as neutrally as possible all the issues related to rationing and priority setting in the NHS. We focus on the NHS for two reasons. Firstly, for those of us resident in the United Kingdom the NHS is the health care system with which we are most familiar and most concerned. Secondly, focusing on one system alone allows more coherent analysis than would be possible if issues in other systems were included as well. Our concern is with the delivery of health care, not its finance, though we discuss the possible effects of changing the financing system of the NHS. Finally, though our position is neutral, we hold two substantive views--namely, that rationing is unavoidable and that there should be more explicit debate about the principles and issues concerned. We consider the issues under four headings: preliminaries, ethics, democracy, and empirical questions. Preliminaries deal with the semantics of rationing, whether rationing is necessary, and with the range of services to which rationing relates. Under ethics and democracy are the substantive issues of principle and theory. The final section deals with empirical questions and those relating to the practicality of various strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health Care and Public Health; National Health Service

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8664673      PMCID: PMC2351311          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1593

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  3 in total

1.  Needs, rights, and equity: more quality in healthcare rationing.

Authors:  L Doyal
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1995-12

2.  A purchaser perspective of managing new drugs: interferon beta as a case study.

Authors:  T Walley; S Barton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-09-23

3.  Rationing in practice: the case of in vitro fertilisation.

Authors:  S Redmayne; R Klein
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-06-05
  3 in total
  26 in total

Review 1.  Healthcare rationing-are additional criteria needed for assessing evidence based clinical practice guidelines?

Authors:  O F Norheim
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-27

2.  Limits to demand for health care. Rationing is needed in a national health service.

Authors:  A Maynard; T Sheldon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-24

3.  Public involvement in health care priority setting: an economic perspective.

Authors:  Tracy Roberts; Stirling Bryan; Chris Heginbotham; Alison McCallum
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 3.377

4.  Ageing Britain--challenges and opportunities for general practice.

Authors:  M Drury; J Neuberger
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Can primary care groups learn how to manage demand from fundholders? A study of fundholders in Nottingham.

Authors:  M D Tobin; C J Packham
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 6.  Drug rationing in the UK National Health Service. Current status and future prospects.

Authors:  T Walley; A Haycox; S Barton
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.981

7.  The end of the affair--public health medicine 1974-2002.

Authors:  Peter Sim
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.386

8.  Beta interferon, NICE, and rationing.

Authors:  David Kernick
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  Are GP leaders scared of sex?

Authors:  Penny Watson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.386

10.  RCGP 'virtual genetics' group meeting: 'the use of the family history in primary care'.

Authors:  Rhydian Hapgood; Michael Modell
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 5.386

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.