Literature DB >> 11696964

Negative consequences of alcohol use among college students: victims or victimizers?

J Yu1.   

Abstract

Focusing on reciprocity between primary and secondary consequences resulting from alcohol use among college students, this study hypothesizes that college students should not be dichotomously viewed as those who generate alcohol-related negative consequences and those who suffer from the consequences generated by fellow students; instead, since students usually live closely together and most of them use alcohol, they constantly affect one another with consequences of their alcohol use. Five colleges in New York State were randomly selected for the study. The telephone interview method was employed to survey college students during the spring semester of 1998. Within each participating college, students were randomly selected through the use of complete student telephone directories provided by the college administration. A total of 813 students were interviewed. Findings indicate that negative consequences of alcohol use among college students may be understood more in a form of group process than in separate individual circumstances. Through association and interaction with other alcohol users, students are frequently victimizing fellow students and being victimized by others in terms of alcohol-related consequences; the severity of alcohol-related hazard for students, thus, tends to be twice as severe as that for individuals who are not in a college environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11696964     DOI: 10.2190/HFAT-L1TN-G9G6-74KN

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Drug Educ        ISSN: 0047-2379


  6 in total

1.  Impact of the "peers as family" dormitory wing-based intervention on college student alcohol use and its secondhand effects.

Authors:  Bradley O Boekeloo; Melinda G Novik; Elizabeth N Bush; Kevin E O'Grady
Journal:  J Drug Educ       Date:  2009

2.  Drinking, Social Abstaining, and Refusing Invitations: Demographic Differences Persist Across College.

Authors:  Kaylin M Greene; Jennifer L Maggs
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2019-12-05       Impact factor: 3.455

3.  Impact of a randomized campus/community trial to prevent high-risk drinking among college students.

Authors:  Mark Wolfson; Heather Champion; Thomas P McCoy; Scott D Rhodes; Edward H Ip; Jill N Blocker; Barbara Alvarez Martin; Kimberly G Wagoner; Mary Claire O'Brien; Erin L Sutfin; Ananda Mitra; Robert H Durant
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-07-23       Impact factor: 3.455

4.  Protective behavioral strategies mediate the effect of drinking motives on alcohol use among heavy drinking college students: gender and race differences.

Authors:  Joseph W Labrie; Andrew Lac; Shannon R Kenney; Tehniat Mirza
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2010-12-10       Impact factor: 3.913

5.  The use of protective behavioral strategies is related to reduced risk in heavy drinking college students with poorer mental and physical health.

Authors:  Joseph W LaBrie; Shannon R Kenney; Andrew Lac
Journal:  J Drug Educ       Date:  2010

6.  Perceptions about residence hall wingmates and alcohol-related secondhand effects among college freshmen.

Authors:  Bradley O Boekeloo; Elizabeth N Bush; Melinda G Novik
Journal:  J Am Coll Health       Date:  2009 May-Jun
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.