Literature DB >> 11693587

Using parental ratings to study the etiology of 3-year-old twins' problem behaviors: different views or rater bias?

J C van der Valk1, E J van den Oord, F C Verhulst, D Boomsma.   

Abstract

Child Behavior Checklist questionnaires (Achenbach, 1992), filled in separately by mothers and fathers, were collected for an effective sample of 3,501 Dutch 3-year-old twin pairs. To disentangle the child's phenotype from that of the rater, two contrasting models were fitted to the data. One model, called a Rater Bias model, is based on the assumption that both parents assess exactly the same behaviors in the child. A weaker alternative of this model, called a Psychometric model, assumes that apart from these common behavioral views, each parent also assesses a unique aspect of the child's behavior. A Psychometric model fitted the data of both Internalizing and Externalizing scales significantly better than a Rater Bias model. This implied that each parent provided unique information from his or her own perspective, apart from the common behavioral view. Using this best fitting model, the etiology of both the Internalizing and Externalizing scales was studied. Common factors (influencing behaviors similarly assessed by both parents) were more important than unique factors (influencing behaviors uniquely assessed by one parent). Common genetic factors explained about 50% of the variance of both scales, indicating a possible inborn vulnerability to childhood psychopathology. Common environmental factors not shared between twins (free of unreliability and error) explained around 14% of both scales, suggesting the importance of pure idiosyncratic experiences even for children as young as 3 years. Common environmental factors shared between twins (unconfounded by rater bias) were only found for the Externalizing scale, explaining 18% of the variance. Rater bias and unreliability, if present in the data, were included in the estimates of the unique factors. Unique genetic, shared, and nonshared environmental factors each explained around 8% of the variance for both scales. These small effects could be detected because of the large sample of twin pairs used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11693587     DOI: 10.1111/1469-7610.00788

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0021-9630            Impact factor:   8.982


  22 in total

Review 1.  Incorporating the family as a critical context in genetic studies of children: implications for understanding pathways to risky behavior and substance use.

Authors:  Richard Rende; Cheryl Slomkowski
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2008-06-12

2.  The co-occurrence between internalizing and externalizing behaviors. A general population twin study.

Authors:  Paola Pesenti-Gritti; Chiara A M Spatola; Corrado Fagnani; Anna Ogliari; Valeria Patriarca; Maria Antonietta Stazi; Marco Battaglia
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2007-09-10       Impact factor: 4.785

3.  The magnitude of genetic and environmental influences on parental and observational measures of behavioral inhibition and shyness in toddlerhood.

Authors:  Ashley K Smith; Soo H Rhee; Robin P Corley; Naomi P Friedman; John K Hewitt; Joann L Robinson
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 2.805

Review 4.  Phenotypic and measurement influences on heritability estimates in childhood ADHD.

Authors:  Christine M Freitag; Luis A Rohde; Thomas Lempp; Marcel Romanos
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2010-03-07       Impact factor: 4.785

5.  Sibling Contagion for Drinking in Adolescence: A Micro Process Framework.

Authors:  Cheryl Slomkowski; Katherine J Conger; Richard Rende; Elsa Heylen; Wendy M Little; Barbara Shebloski; Patricia Fox; Jessie L Craine; Rand D Conger
Journal:  Eur J Dev Sci       Date:  2009-09-01

Review 6.  Principles underlying the use of multiple informants' reports.

Authors:  Andres De Los Reyes; Sarah A Thomas; Kimberly L Goodman; Shannon M A Kundey
Journal:  Annu Rev Clin Psychol       Date:  2012-11-05       Impact factor: 18.561

7.  Do Genetic Factors Explain the Links Between Callous-Unemotional, Attention Hyperactivity and Oppositional Defiant Problems in Toddlers?

Authors:  Megan Flom; Kimberly J Saudino
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2018-08

8.  School-associated problem behavior in childhood and adolescence and development of adult schizotypal symptoms: a follow-up of a clinical cohort.

Authors:  Selene Fagel; Leo de Sonneville; Herman van Engeland; Hanna Swaab
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2014

9.  Measuring quantitative autism traits in families: informant effect or intergenerational transmission?

Authors:  Wouter De la Marche; Ilse Noens; Sofie Kuppens; Jantine L Spilt; Bart Boets; Jean Steyaert
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2014-08-03       Impact factor: 4.785

10.  Hyperactive-impulsive symptom scores and oppositional behaviours reflect alternate manifestations of a single liability.

Authors:  Alexis C Wood; Frühling Rijsdijk; Philip Asherson; Jonna Kuntsi
Journal:  Behav Genet       Date:  2009-07-25       Impact factor: 2.805

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.