Literature DB >> 11688619

Health services research using linked records: who consents and what is the gain?

A F Young1, A J Dobson, J E Byles.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess consent to record linkage, describe the characteristics of consenters and compare self-report versus Medicare records of general practitioner use.
METHOD: Almost 40,000 women in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Women's Health were sent a request by mail for permission to link their Medicare records and survey data.
RESULTS: 19,700 women consented: 37% of young (18-23 years), 59% of mid-age (45-50 years) and 53% of older women (70-75 years). Consenters tended to have higher levels of education and, among the older cohort, were in better health than non-consenters. Women tended to under-report the number of visits to general practitioners.
CONCLUSIONS: Record linkage of survey and Medicare data on a large scale is feasible. The linked data provide information on health and socio-economic status which are valuable for understanding health service utilisation. IMPLICATIONS: Linked records provide a powerful tool for health care research, particularly in longitudinal studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11688619

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust N Z J Public Health        ISSN: 1326-0200            Impact factor:   2.939


  24 in total

1.  Randomized trial showed that an "embedded" survey strategy optimized authorization rates compared with two "after survey" strategies in veterans with PTSD.

Authors:  Maureen Murdoch; Diane M Pietila; Melissa R Partin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Recruiting patients to medical research: double blind randomised trial of "opt-in" versus "opt-out" strategies.

Authors:  Cornelia Junghans; Gene Feder; Harry Hemingway; Adam Timmis; Melvyn Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-12

3.  Who doesn't authorize the linking of survey and administrative health data? A general population-based investigation.

Authors:  Timothy J Beebe; Jeanette Y Ziegenfuss; Sarah M Jenkins; Lindsey R Haas; Michael E Davern
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2011-04-16       Impact factor: 3.797

4.  Ethical and practical challenges to studying patients who opt out of large-scale biorepository research.

Authors:  S Trent Rosenbloom; Jennifer L Madison; Kyle B Brothers; Erica A Bowton; Ellen Wright Clayton; Bradley A Malin; Dan M Roden; Jill Pulley
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-07-25       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  A decision aid to support informed choices about bowel cancer screening among adults with low education: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Sian K Smith; Lyndal Trevena; Judy M Simpson; Alexandra Barratt; Don Nutbeam; Kirsten J McCaffery
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2010-10-26

6.  LINKING SURVEY AND ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS: MECHANISMS OF CONSENT.

Authors:  Joseph W Sakshaug; Mick P Couper; Mary Beth Ofstedal; David R Weir
Journal:  Sociol Methods Res       Date:  2012-11

7.  Accuracy of telephone self-report of drug use in older people and agreement with pharmaceutical claims data.

Authors:  Sabrina Winona Pit; Julie Ellen Byles; Jill Cockburn
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.923

8.  Presence of bacteriuria caused by trimethoprim resistant bacteria in patients prescribed antibiotics: multilevel model with practice and individual patient data.

Authors:  P T Donnan; L Wei; D T Steinke; G Phillips; R Clarke; A Noone; F M Sullivan; T M MacDonald; P G Davey
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-29

9.  Does government subsidy for costs of medical and pharmaceutical services result in higher service utilization by older widowed women in Australia?

Authors:  Leigh R Tooth; Richard Hockey; Susan Treloar; Christine McClintock; Annette Dobson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-06-27       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  A randomised controlled trial to compare opt-in and opt-out parental consent for childhood vaccine safety surveillance using data linkage: study protocol.

Authors:  Jesia G Berry; Philip Ryan; Annette J Braunack-Mayer; Katherine M Duszynski; Vicki Xafis; Michael S Gold
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2011-01-04       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.