Literature DB >> 27375305

LINKING SURVEY AND ADMINISTRATIVE RECORDS: MECHANISMS OF CONSENT.

Joseph W Sakshaug1, Mick P Couper2, Mary Beth Ofstedal2, David R Weir2.   

Abstract

Survey records are increasingly being linked to administrative databases to enhance the survey data and increase research opportunities for data users. A necessary prerequisite to linking survey and administrative records is obtaining informed consent from respondents. Obtaining consent from all respondents is a difficult challenge and one that faces significant resistance. Consequently, data linkage consent rates vary widely from study-to-study. Several studies have found significant differences between consenters and non-consenters on socio-demographic variables, but no study has investigated the underlying mechanisms of consent from a theory-driven perspective. In this study, we describe and test several hypotheses related to respondents' willingness to consent to an earnings and benefit data linkage request based on mechanisms related to financial uncertainty, privacy concerns, resistance towards the survey interview, level of attentiveness during the interview, the respondents' preexisting relationship with the administrative data agency, and matching respondents and interviewers on observable characteristics. The results point to several implications for survey practice and suggestions for future research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Administrative records; Attentiveness; Consent; Data linkage; Health and Retirement Study; Interviewer effects; Mechanisms; Privacy

Year:  2012        PMID: 27375305      PMCID: PMC4928635          DOI: 10.1177/0049124112460381

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sociol Methods Res        ISSN: 0049-1241


  27 in total

1.  The psychological meaning of acquiescence set for authoritarianism.

Authors:  N L GAGE; G S LEAVITT; G C STONE
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  1957-07

2.  Self-reported use of mental health services versus administrative records: care to recall?

Authors:  Anne E Rhodes; Kinwah Fung
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.035

3.  Randomized trial showed that an "embedded" survey strategy optimized authorization rates compared with two "after survey" strategies in veterans with PTSD.

Authors:  Maureen Murdoch; Diane M Pietila; Melissa R Partin
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 6.437

4.  Linking questionnaires to primary care records: factors affecting consent in older people.

Authors:  Tess Harris; Derek G Cook; Christina Victor; Carole Beighton; Stephen Dewilde; Iain Carey
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.710

5.  Mother's consent to linkage of survey data with her child's birth records in a multi-ethnic national cohort study.

Authors:  A Rosemary Tate; Lisa Calderwood; Carol Dezateux; Heather Joshi
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-12-22       Impact factor: 7.196

Review 6.  Evaluation of 2-week doctor visit reporting in the national health interview survey.

Authors:  W S Edwards; D M Winn; J G Collins
Journal:  Vital Health Stat 2       Date:  1996-08

Review 7.  Linking Medicare and national survey data.

Authors:  L A Lillard; M M Farmer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-10-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Population-based cohort development in Alberta, Canada: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Heather Bryant; Paula J Robson; Ruth Ullman; Christine Friedenreich; Ursula Dawe
Journal:  Chronic Dis Can       Date:  2006

9.  Bias from requiring explicit consent from all participants in observational research: prospective, population based study.

Authors:  Rustam Al-Shahi; Céline Vousden; Charles Warlow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-10-13

10.  Patterns of consent in epidemiologic research: evidence from over 25,000 responders.

Authors:  Kate M Dunn; Kelvin Jordan; Rosie J Lacey; Mark Shapley; Clare Jinks
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more
  9 in total

1.  Data Resource Profile: Cohort and Longitudinal Studies Enhancement Resources (CLOSER).

Authors:  Dara O'Neill; Michaela Benzeval; Andy Boyd; Lisa Calderwood; Cyrus Cooper; Louise Corti; Elaine Dennison; Emla Fitzsimons; Alissa Goodman; Rebecca Hardy; Hazel Inskip; Lynn Molloy; Amanda Sacker; Allan Sudlow; Alice Sullivan; Alison Park
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 7.196

2.  Linking Survey and Twitter Data: Informed Consent, Disclosure, Security, and Archiving.

Authors:  Luke Sloan; Curtis Jessop; Tarek Al Baghal; Matthew Williams
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2019-06-21       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  A systematic literature review of health consumer attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: a focus on privacy, trust, and transparency.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hutchings; Max Loomes; Phyllis Butow; Frances M Boyle
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2020-10-09

4.  A systematic literature review of attitudes towards secondary use and sharing of health administrative and clinical trial data: a focus on consent.

Authors:  Elizabeth Hutchings; Max Loomes; Phyllis Butow; Frances M Boyle
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2021-05-04

5.  Enhancing Human Biomonitoring Studies through Linkage to Administrative Registers-Status in Europe.

Authors:  Helle Margrete Meltzer; Tina Kold Jensen; Ondřej Májek; Hanns Moshammer; Maria Wennberg; Agneta Åkesson; Hanna Tolonen
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-05-06       Impact factor: 3.390

6.  Record linkage to enhance consented cohort and routinely collected health data from a UK birth cohort.

Authors:  Karen Susan Tingay; Amrita Bandyopadhyay; Lucy Griffiths; Ashley Akbari; Sinead Brophy; Helen Bedford; Mario Cortina-Borja; Efrosini Setakis; Suzann Walton; Emla Fitzsimons; Carol Dezateux; Ronan A Lyons
Journal:  Int J Popul Data Sci       Date:  2019-04-02

7.  National data opt out programme: consequences for maternity statistics in England.

Authors:  Kate Marie Lewis; Pia Hardelid
Journal:  Int J Popul Data Sci       Date:  2020-01-30

8.  Consent to data linkage in a large online epidemiological survey of 18-23 year old Australian women in 2012-13.

Authors:  Anna Graves; Deirdre McLaughlin; Janni Leung; Jennifer Powers
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 4.615

9.  Sources of potential bias when combining routine data linkage and a national survey of secondary school-aged children: a record linkage study.

Authors:  Kelly Morgan; Nicholas Page; Rachel Brown; Sara Long; Gillian Hewitt; Marcos Del Pozo-Banos; Ann John; Simon Murphy; Graham Moore
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2020-07-02       Impact factor: 4.612

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.