Literature DB >> 11688546

Effects of the acoustical dynamic range on speech recognition with cochlear implants.

G Cosendai1, M Pelizzone.   

Abstract

The amplitude compression function in a speech processor for cochlear implants maps the wide acoustical dynamic range of sounds into the smaller electrical dynamic range available on the implanted electrodes. In this study, we examined the effects of systematic variations of the acoustical dynamic range of the compression function on speech recognition with cochlear implants. Statistical measures of the amplitude distribution of speech sounds were made in each channel of a research speech processor providing more than 50 dB of input signal-to-noise ratio. Several systematic variations of the dynamic range of the compression function were implemented on this basis, and speech recognition was determined using vowel and consonant identification tests in three experienced cochlear implant users. Results demonstrated that the acoustical dynamic range of the compression function does have a significant effect on speech recognition with cochlear implants. They suggest that a dynamic range of about 45 dB is necessary for optimal speech recognition.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11688546     DOI: 10.3109/00206090109073121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Audiology        ISSN: 0020-6091


  6 in total

1.  Optimizing the perception of soft speech and speech in noise with the Advanced Bionics cochlear implant system.

Authors:  Laura K Holden; Ruth M Reeder; Jill B Firszt; Charles C Finley
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 2.117

2.  Factors contributing to speech perception scores in long-term pediatric cochlear implant users.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Peter J Blamey; Emily A Tobey; Christine A Brenner
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 3.570

3.  Interdependence of linguistic and indexical speech perception skills in school-age children with early cochlear implantation.

Authors:  Ann E Geers; Lisa S Davidson; Rosalie M Uchanski; Johanna G Nicholas
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.570

4.  The Effects of Preprocessing Strategies for Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients.

Authors:  Bernadette Rakszawski; Rose Wright; Jamie H Cadieux; Lisa S Davidson; Christine Brenner
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.664

5.  The transtympanic promontory stimulation test in patients with auditory deprivation: correlations with electrical dynamics of cochlear implant and speech perception.

Authors:  Mohammad Alfelasi; Jean Pierre Piron; Caroline Mathiolon; Nadjmah Lenel; Michel Mondain; Alain Uziel; Frederic Venail
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-09-30       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Cochlear implant characteristics and speech perception skills of adolescents with long-term device use.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Ann E Geers; Christine Brenner
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.311

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.