Literature DB >> 16477472

Development of a strength test battery for evaluating leg muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament injury and reconstruction.

Camille Neeter1, Alexander Gustavsson, Pia Thomeé, Jesper Augustsson, Roland Thomeé, Jon Karlsson.   

Abstract

A more sports-specific and detailed strength assessment has been advocated for patients after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to develop a test battery of lower extremity strength tests with high ability to discriminate between leg power development on the injured and uninjured sides in patients after ACL injury and in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. Twenty-three patients were tested 6 months after ACL injury and 44 patients were tested 6 months after ACL reconstruction. Twenty-four of the 44 patients were operated on using a hamstrings graft and 20 patients were operated on using a patellar tendon graft. All the patients performed a test battery of three strength tests for each leg in a randomised order. The three strength tests were chosen to reflect quadriceps and hamstring muscular power in a knee-extension and a knee-flexion test (open kinetic chain) and lower-extremity muscular power in a leg-press test (closed kinetic chain). There was a higher sensitivity for the test battery to discriminate abnormal leg power compared with any of the three strength tests individually. Nine out of ten patients after ACL reconstruction and six out of ten of the patients after ACL injury exhibited abnormal leg power symmetry using the test battery. Thus, this test battery had high ability in terms of discriminating between the leg power performance on the injured and uninjured side, both in patients with an ACL injury and in patients who have undergone ACL reconstruction. It is concluded that a test battery consisting of a knee-extension, knee-flexion and leg-press muscle power test had high ability to determine deficits in leg power 6 months after ACL injury and reconstruction. Only a minority of the patients had restored leg muscle power. The clinical relevance is that the test battery may contribute to the decision-making process when deciding whether and when patients can safely return to strenuous physical activities after an ACL injury or reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16477472     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-006-0040-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  60 in total

1.  Effect of pre-exhaustion exercise on lower-extremity muscle activation during a leg press exercise.

Authors:  Jesper Augustsson; Roland Thomeé; Per Hörnstedt; Jens Lindblom; Jon Karlsson; Gunnar Grimby
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Changes in muscle torque following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison between hamstrings and patella tendon graft procedures on 45 patients.

Authors:  Jayne L Anderson; Sallie E Lamb; Karen L Barker; Stephanie Davies; Christopher A Dodd; David J Beard
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  2002-10

3.  Isokinetic knee extensor strength and functional performance in healthy female soccer players.

Authors:  A Ostenberg; E Roos; C Ekdahl; H Roos
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 4.221

Review 4.  Anterior cruciate ligament instability and reconstruction. Review of current trends in treatment.

Authors:  H Roos; J Karlsson
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Motor performance in different dynamic tests in knee rehabilitation.

Authors:  K Pfeifer; W Banzer
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries.

Authors:  Y Tegner; J Lysholm
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Brace-free rehabilitation, with early return to activity, for knees reconstructed with a double-looped semitendinosus and gracilis graft.

Authors:  S M Howell; M A Taylor
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Laxity, instability, and functional outcome after ACL injury: copers versus noncopers.

Authors:  M E Eastlack; M J Axe; L Snyder-Mackler
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Functional capability is enhanced with semitendinosus than patellar tendon ACL repair.

Authors:  Thorsten Rudroff
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Accelerated rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  K D Shelbourne; P Nitz
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 4.751

View more
  53 in total

1.  The clinical utility of functional performance tests within one-year post-acl reconstruction: a systematic review.

Authors:  Elizabeth Narducci; Amanda Waltz; Katheryn Gorski; Lucas Leppla; Megan Donaldson
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-12

2.  The reliability of the vail sport test™ as a measure of physical performance following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  J Craig Garrison; Ellen Shanley; Chuck Thigpen; Ryan Geary; Mike Osler; Jackie Delgiorno
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-02

Review 3.  Muscle strength and hop performance criteria prior to return to sports after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Roland Thomeé; Yonatan Kaplan; Joanna Kvist; Grethe Myklebust; May Arna Risberg; Daniel Theisen; Elias Tsepis; Suzanne Werner; Barbara Wondrasch; Erik Witvrouw
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-20       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Variability in leg muscle power and hop performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Roland Thomeé; Camille Neeter; Alexander Gustavsson; Pia Thomeé; Jesper Augustsson; Bengt Eriksson; Jon Karlsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-02-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Documentation of strength training for research purposes after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Jesper Augustsson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2012-08-17       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Measures of Agility and Single-Legged Balance as Clinical Assessments in Patients With Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction and Healthy Individuals.

Authors:  Aleah N Kirsch; Stephan G Bodkin; Susan A Saliba; Joseph M Hart
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2019-10-16       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Autologous patellar tendon and quadrupled hamstring grafts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized multicenter review of different fixation methods.

Authors:  Jon Olav Drogset; Torbjørn Strand; Gisle Uppheim; Bjørn Odegård; Asbjørn Bøe; Torbjørn Grøntvedt
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-12-03       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  A 2-year follow-up of rehabilitation after ACL reconstruction using patellar tendon or hamstring tendon grafts: a prospective randomised outcome study.

Authors:  Annette Heijne; Suzanne Werner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-10-23       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Return to sport.

Authors:  Roland Thomeé; Suzanne Werner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Knee extension and flexion muscle power after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon graft or hamstring tendons graft: a cross-sectional comparison 3 years post surgery.

Authors:  Eva Ageberg; Harald P Roos; Karin Grävare Silbernagel; Roland Thomeé; Ewa M Roos
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.