Literature DB >> 11675313

Error in radiology.

P Goddard1, A Leslie, A Jones, C Wakeley, J Kabala.   

Abstract

The level of error in radiology has been tabulated from articles on error and on "double reporting" or "double reading". The level of error varies depending on the radiological investigation, but the range is 2-20% for clinically significant or major error. The greatest reduction in error rates will come from changes in systems.

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11675313     DOI： 10.1259/bjr.74.886.740949

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN： 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  20 in total

1.  Development of an Automated Bone Mineral Density Software Application: Facilitation Radiologic Reporting and Improvement of Accuracy.

Authors:  I-Ta Tsai; Meng-Yuan Tsai; Ming-Ting Wu; Clement Kuen-Huang Chen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 2.  Errors in imaging patients in the emergency setting.

Authors:  Antonio Pinto; Alfonso Reginelli; Fabio Pinto; Giuseppe Lo Re; Federico Midiri; Carlo Muzj; Luigia Romano; Luca Brunese
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Abdominal and pelvic computed tomography (CT) interpretation: discrepancy rates among experienced radiologists.

Authors:  Hani H Abujudeh; Giles W Boland; Rathachai Kaewlai; Pavel Rabiner; Elkarn F Halpern; G Scott Gazelle; James H Thrall
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Medico-legal claims against English radiologists: 1995-2006.

Authors:  S F S Halpin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Do clinicians read our reports? Integrating the radiology information system with the electronic patient record: experiences from the first 2 years.

Authors:  Petter Hurlen; Truls Østbye; Arne Borthne; Fredrik A Dahl; Pål Gulbrandsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-08-06       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Introducing PACS to the late majority. A longitudinal study.

Authors:  Petter Hurlen; Truls Østbye; Arne Borthne; Pål Gulbrandsen
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2008-11-01       Impact factor: 4.056

Review 7.  Errors in neuroradiology.

Authors:  Ferdinando Caranci; Enrico Tedeschi; Giuseppe Leone; Alfonso Reginelli; Gianluca Gatta; Antonio Pinto; Ettore Squillaci; Francesco Briganti; Luca Brunese
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 3.469

8.  Doctor-patient communication in radiology: a great opportunity for future radiology.

Authors:  M Bazzocchi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 3.469

9.  High Interobserver Agreement for the Standardized Reporting System SSTR-RADS 1.0 on Somatostatin Receptor PET/CT.

Authors:  Rudolf A Werner; Thorsten Derlin; Steven P Rowe; Lena Bundschuh; Gabriel T Sheikh; Martin G Pomper; Sebastian Schulz; Takahiro Higuchi; Andreas K Buck; Frank M Bengel; Ralph A Bundschuh; Constantin Lapa
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2020-08-28       Impact factor: 10.057

10.  Interobserver agreement in the interpretation of outpatient head CT scans in an academic neuroradiology practice.

Authors:  G Guérin; S Jamali; C A Soto; F Guilbert; J Raymond
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-07-24       Impact factor: 3.825
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.