Literature DB >> 11673367

The national glycohemoglobin standardization program: a five-year progress report.

R R Little1, C L Rohlfing, H M Wiedmeyer, G L Myers, D B Sacks, D E Goldstein.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT) and the United Kingdom Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) demonstrated conclusively that risks for complications in patients with diabetes are directly related to glycemic control, as measured by glycohemoglobin (GHB). In 1994, one year after the DCCT results were reported, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) set specific diabetes treatment goals. However, 1993 College of American Pathologists (CAP) Survey results indicated a lack of comparability of GHB test results among methods and laboratories that represented a major obstacle to meaningful implementation of the ADA guidelines. Thus, an AACC subcommittee was formed in 1993 to develop a standardization program that would enable laboratories to report DCCT-traceable GHB results. This program was implemented in 1996 by the National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program (NGSP) Steering Committee. APPROACH: We review the NGSP process and summarize progress in standardization through analysis of CAP data. CONTENT: Since 1996, the number of methods and laboratories certified by the NGSP as traceable to the DCCT has steadily increased. CAP GH2-B survey results reported in December 2000 show marked improvement over 1993 data in the comparability of GHB results. In 2000, 90% of surveyed laboratories reported GHB results as hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) or equivalent, compared with 50% in 1993. Of laboratories reporting HbA(1c) in 2000, 78% used a NGSP-certified method. For most certified methods in 2000, between-laboratory CVs were <5%. For all certified methods in 2000, the mean percent HbA(1c) was within 0.8% HbA(1c) of the NGSP target at all HbA(1c) concentrations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11673367

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  101 in total

Review 1.  The National Glycohemoglobin Standardization Program: Over 20 Years of Improving Hemoglobin A1c Measurement.

Authors:  Randie R Little; Curt Rohlfing; David B Sacks
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 8.327

2.  Consensus treatment plans for induction therapy of newly diagnosed proliferative lupus nephritis in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Rina Mina; Emily von Scheven; Stacy P Ardoin; B Anne Eberhard; Marilynn Punaro; Norman Ilowite; Joyce Hsu; Marisa Klein-Gitelman; L Nandini Moorthy; Eyal Muscal; Suhas M Radhakrishna; Linda Wagner-Weiner; Matthew Adams; Peter Blier; Lenore Buckley; Elizabeth Chalom; Gaëlle Chédeville; Andrew Eichenfield; Natalya Fish; Michael Henrickson; Aimee O Hersh; Roger Hollister; Olcay Jones; Lawrence Jung; Deborah Levy; Jorge Lopez-Benitez; Deborah McCurdy; Paivi M Miettunen; Ana I Quintero-del Rio; Deborah Rothman; Ornella Rullo; Natasha Ruth; Laura E Schanberg; Earl Silverman; Nora G Singer; Jennifer Soep; Reema Syed; Larry B Vogler; Ali Yalcindag; Cagri Yildirim-Toruner; Carol A Wallace; Hermine I Brunner
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.794

Review 3.  Does familial clustering of risk factors for long-term diabetic complications leave any place for genes that act independently?

Authors:  Andrew D Paterson; Shelley B Bull
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2012-06-23       Impact factor: 4.132

4.  Standardization of HbA1c: good or bad?

Authors:  Sally M Marshall
Journal:  Nat Rev Endocrinol       Date:  2010-05-04       Impact factor: 43.330

5.  A dietary pattern protective against type 2 diabetes in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC)--Potsdam Study cohort.

Authors:  C Heidemann; K Hoffmann; J Spranger; K Klipstein-Grobusch; M Möhlig; A F H Pfeiffer; H Boeing
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2005-05-12       Impact factor: 10.122

6.  How should HbA1c measurements be reported?

Authors:  F Gorus; C Mathieu; E Gerlo
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Consensus statement on the worldwide standardisation of the HbA1c measurement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2007-08-22       Impact factor: 10.122

8.  Changes in dried blood spot Hb A1c with varied postcollection conditions.

Authors:  Orfeu M Buxton; Keith Malarick; Wei Wang; Teresa Seeman
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2009-03-19       Impact factor: 8.327

9.  Determination of glycated hemoglobin in patients with advanced liver disease.

Authors:  Theresa Lahousen; Karin Hegenbarth; Rottraut Ille; Rainer-W Lipp; Robert Krause; Randie-R Little; Wolfgang-J Schnedl
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-08-01       Impact factor: 5.742

10.  Towards worldwide standardisation of HbA1c determination.

Authors:  K Miedema
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.