Literature DB >> 11668646

Sex differences in songbirds 25 years later: what have we learned and where do we go?

G F Ball1, S A MacDougall-Shackleton.   

Abstract

About 25 years ago, Nottebohm and Arnold reported that there are profound male-biased sex differences in volume in selected nuclei in telencephalic portions of the song control system. This review focuses on issues related to the cellular bases of these sex differences in volume and comparative studies that might elucidate the function of this variation between the sexes. Studies utilizing a variety of neurohistological methods in several different species to define the boundaries of two key telencephalic song nuclei HVc and the robust nucleus of the archistriatum (RA) all tend to find a sex difference in volume in agreement with Nissl-defined boundaries. Sex differences in volume in nuclei such as HVc and RA are associated with differences in cell size and cell number. Other attributes of the phenotype of cells in these nuclei are also different in males and females such as the number of cells expressing androgen receptors. Comparative studies have been employed to understand the function of these sex differences in the brain. In some songbird species, females sing rarely or not at all, and the brain nuclei that control song are many times larger volume in males than females. In other species, males and females sing approximately equally, and the brain nuclei that control song are approximately equal between the sexes. Recently, statistical methods have been employed to control for phylogenetic effects while comparing the co-evolution of traits. This analysis indicates that the evolution of sex differences in song has co-evolved with the evolution of sex differences in singing behavior in songbird species. Future studies should focus on the function of the smaller song control nuclei of females and investigate the role these nuclei might play in perception as well as in production. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11668646     DOI: 10.1002/jemt.1146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microsc Res Tech        ISSN: 1059-910X            Impact factor:   2.769


  11 in total

1.  Sexually dimorphic sensory gating drives behavioral differences in tungara frogs.

Authors:  Kim L Hoke; Michael J Ryan; Walter Wilczynski
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.312

Review 2.  Species variation in the degree of sex differences in brain and behaviour related to birdsong: adaptations and constraints.

Authors:  Gregory F Ball
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 3.  Multifaceted origins of sex differences in the brain.

Authors:  Margaret M McCarthy
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Lesions targeted to the anterior forebrain disrupt vocal variability associated with testosterone-induced sensorimotor song development in adult female canaries, Serinus canaria.

Authors:  Melvin L Rouse; Gregory F Ball
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 3.964

5.  DHEA and estradiol levels in brain, gonads, adrenal glands, and plasma of developing male and female European starlings.

Authors:  Amit H Shah; Eunice H Chin; Kim L Schmidt; Kiran K Soma
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Measurements of neuron soma size and density in rat dorsal striatum, nucleus accumbens core and nucleus accumbens shell: differences between striatal region and brain hemisphere, but not sex.

Authors:  John Meitzen; Kelsey R Pflepsen; Christopher M Stern; Robert L Meisel; Paul G Mermelstein
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 3.046

7.  Song and the song control pathway in the brain can develop independently of exposure to song in the sedge warbler.

Authors:  Stefan Leitner; Joanne Nicholson; Bernd Leisler; Timothy J DeVoogd; Clive K Catchpole
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-12-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Physiological control of elaborate male courtship: female choice for neuromuscular systems.

Authors:  Leonida Fusani; Julia Barske; Lainy D Day; Matthew J Fuxjager; Barney A Schlinger
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2014-07-31       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Anatomically discrete sex differences in neuroplasticity in zebra finches as reflected by perineuronal nets.

Authors:  Gilles Cornez; Sita M ter Haar; Charlotte A Cornil; Jacques Balthazart
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  Sex differences and similarities in the neural circuit regulating song and other reproductive behaviors in songbirds.

Authors:  Gregory F Ball; Jacques Balthazart
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2020-07-28       Impact factor: 8.989

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.