Literature DB >> 11653245

Disclosing misattributed paternity.

Lainie Friedman Ross.   

Abstract

In 1994, the Committee on Assessing Genetic Risks of the Institute of Medicine published their recommendations regarding the ethical issues raised by advances in genetics. One of the Committee's recommendations was to inform women when test results revealed misattributed paternity, but not to disclose this information to the women's partners. The Committee's reason for withholding such information was that "genetic testing should not be used in ways that disrupt families". In this paper, I argue that the Committee's conclusion in favour of non-disclosure to the male partner is unethical. I argue that both parties ought to be informed.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 11653245     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.1996.tb00111.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bioethics        ISSN: 0269-9702            Impact factor:   1.898


  14 in total

1.  Enhancing the ethical conduct of genetic research: investigating views of parents on including their healthy children in a study on mild hearing loss.

Authors:  L Gillam; Z Poulakis; S Tobin; M Wake
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  The future of incidental findings: should they be viewed as benefits?

Authors:  Lisa S Parker
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

Review 3.  Return of individual research results and incidental findings: facing the challenges of translational science.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf
Journal:  Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 8.929

4.  The dilemma of revealing sensitive information on paternity status in Arabian social and cultural contexts: telling the truth about paternity in Saudi Arabia.

Authors:  Abdallah A Adlan; Henk A M J ten Have
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2012-10-12       Impact factor: 1.352

Review 5.  Points to Consider: Ethical, Legal, and Psychosocial Implications of Genetic Testing in Children and Adolescents.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Botkin; John W Belmont; Jonathan S Berg; Benjamin E Berkman; Yvonne Bombard; Ingrid A Holm; Howard P Levy; Kelly E Ormond; Howard M Saal; Nancy B Spinner; Benjamin S Wilfond; Joseph D McInerney
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 11.025

Review 6.  Maternal uniparental isodisomy causing autosomal recessive GM1 gangliosidosis: a clinical report.

Authors:  Jessica E King; Amy Dexter; Inder Gadi; Val Zvereff; Meaghan Martin; Miriam Bloom; Adeline Vanderver; Amy Pizzino; Johanna L Schmidt
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 7.  Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences.

Authors:  Mark A Bellis; Karen Hughes; Sara Hughes; John R Ashton
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.710

Review 8.  Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations.

Authors:  Susan M Wolf; Frances P Lawrenz; Charles A Nelson; Jeffrey P Kahn; Mildred K Cho; Ellen Wright Clayton; Joel G Fletcher; Michael K Georgieff; Dale Hammerschmidt; Kathy Hudson; Judy Illes; Vivek Kapur; Moira A Keane; Barbara A Koenig; Bonnie S Leroy; Elizabeth G McFarland; Jordan Paradise; Lisa S Parker; Sharon F Terry; Brian Van Ness; Benjamin S Wilfond
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

9.  Incidental findings in pediatric research.

Authors:  Benjamin S Wilfond; Katherine J Carpenter
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

10.  Incidental findings in genetics research using archived DNA.

Authors:  Ellen Wright Clayton
Journal:  J Law Med Ethics       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.718

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.