Literature DB >> 16943337

Enhancing the ethical conduct of genetic research: investigating views of parents on including their healthy children in a study on mild hearing loss.

L Gillam1, Z Poulakis, S Tobin, M Wake.   

Abstract

Clinical genetic research is often regarded as more ethically problematic than other forms of research, and in some countries is subject to specific regulation, requiring researchers to follow specialised guidelines. In this paper, an approach to enhancing the ethical conduct of genetic research is proposed, which is believed to be more effective than simply attempting to follow general guidelines. The potential concerns, likely areas of misunderstanding and negative reactions of the participant group are systematically investigated before starting a study on genetics. This would constitute, in effect, an ethical pilot study, similar to a feasibility pilot study to test equipment, procedures and logistics. The findings of the ethical pilot study would be used to help in designing ethically important aspects of research protocol, such as recruitment procedures, written and other information for potential participants, informed consent processes and reporting of results including ambiguous or uncertain results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16943337      PMCID: PMC2563404          DOI: 10.1136/jme.2005.013201

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  11 in total

Review 1.  Genetic causes of hearing loss.

Authors:  P J Willems
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2000-04-13       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Disclosing misattributed paternity.

Authors:  Lainie Friedman Ross
Journal:  Bioethics       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 1.898

3.  Therapeutic misconception in clinical research: frequency and risk factors.

Authors:  Paul S Appelbaum; Charles W Lidz; Thomas Grisso
Journal:  IRB       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr

Review 4.  Genetics and molecular biology of deafness. Update.

Authors:  K M Grundfast; N Siparsky; D Chuong
Journal:  Otolaryngol Clin North Am       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 3.346

Review 5.  Genetic research, adolescents, and informed consent.

Authors:  R F Weir; J R Horton
Journal:  Theor Med       Date:  1995-12

6.  ASHG report. Statement on informed consent for genetic research. The American Society of Human Genetics.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 11.025

7.  Ethical issues in genetic research: disclosure and informed consent.

Authors:  P R Reilly; M F Boshar; S H Holtzman
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 38.330

8.  Informed consent for population-based research involving genetics.

Authors:  L M Beskow; W Burke; J F Merz; P A Barr; S Terry; V B Penchaszadeh; L O Gostin; M Gwinn; M J Khoury
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2001-11-14       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Research knowledge among parents of children participating in a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Benedetto Vitiello; Michael G Aman; Lawrence Scahill; James T McCracken; Christopher J McDougle; Elaine Tierney; Mark Davies; L Eugene Arnold
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 8.829

10.  Patient expectations of benefit from phase I clinical trials: linguistic considerations in diagnosing a therapeutic misconception.

Authors:  K P Weinfurt; D P Sulmasy; K A Schulman; N J Meropol
Journal:  Theor Med Bioeth       Date:  2003
View more
  2 in total

1.  A pilot assessment of parental practices and attitudes regarding risk disclosure and clinical research involving children in Huntington disease families.

Authors:  Leon S Dure; Kimberly Quaid; T Mark Beasley
Journal:  Genet Med       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 8.822

2.  A mixed-methods study on perceptions towards use of Rapid Ethical Assessment to improve informed consent processes for health research in a low-income setting.

Authors:  Adamu Addissie; Gail Davey; Melanie J Newport; Thomas Addissie; Hayley MacGregor; Yeweyenhareg Feleke; Bobbie Farsides
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2014-05-02       Impact factor: 2.652

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.