Literature DB >> 11642696

Bottom-up and top-down influences on auditory scene analysis: evidence from event-related brain potentials.

C Alain1, S R Arnott, T W Picton.   

Abstract

The physiological processes underlying the segregation of concurrent sounds were investigated through the use of event-related brain potentials. The stimuli were complex sounds containing multiple harmonics, one of which could be mistuned so that it was no longer an integer multiple of the fundamental. Perception of concurrent auditory objects increased with degree of mistuning and was accompanied by negative and positive waves that peaked at 180 and 400 ms poststimulus, respectively. The negative wave, referred to as object-related negativity, was present during passive listening, but the positive wave was not. These findings indicate bottom-up and top-down influences during auditory scene analysis. Brain electrical source analyses showed that distinguishing simultaneous auditory objects involved a widely distributed neural network that included auditory cortices, the medial temporal lobe, and posterior association cortices.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11642696     DOI: 10.1037//0096-1523.27.5.1072

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  43 in total

1.  Sensitivity of human auditory evoked potentials to the harmonicity of complex tones: evidence for dissociated cortical processes of spectral and periodicity analysis.

Authors:  S J Jones
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-17       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Behind the scenes of auditory perception.

Authors:  Shihab A Shamma; Christophe Micheyl
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Neural time course of visually enhanced echo suppression.

Authors:  Christopher W Bishop; Sam London; Lee M Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Effects of visual attentional load on low-level auditory scene analysis.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson; Claude Alain; Yu He
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.282

Review 5.  Recent advances in exploring the neural underpinnings of auditory scene perception.

Authors:  Joel S Snyder; Mounya Elhilali
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2017-02-15       Impact factor: 5.691

6.  Attention is critical for spatial auditory object formation.

Authors:  Benjamin H Zobel; Richard L Freyman; Lisa D Sanders
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  It all sounds the same to me: sequential ERP and behavioral effects during pitch and harmonicity judgments.

Authors:  Benjamin J Dyson; Claude Alain
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 3.282

8.  Manipulations of listeners' echo perception are reflected in event-related potentials.

Authors:  Lisa D Sanders; Benjamin H Zobel; Richard L Freyman; Rachel Keen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  The precedence effect in sound localization.

Authors:  Andrew D Brown; G Christopher Stecker; Daniel J Tollin
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2014-12-06

10.  Neural correlates of attention and streaming in a perceptually multistable auditory illusion.

Authors:  Anahita H Mehta; Ifat Yasin; Andrew J Oxenham; Shihab Shamma
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.