Literature DB >> 11641728

Organ doses and subjective image quality of indirect digital panoramic radiography.

F Gijbels1, G Sanderink, C Bou Serhal, H Pauwels, R Jacobs.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine if slight variations in exposure will affect diagnostic image quality and absorbed radiation doses for digital and analogue panoramic radiography.
METHODS: Thermoluminescent dosimeters were placed in the thyroid gland, eyes, submandibular glands, parotid glands and skin of two human cadaver heads. Three different exposure settings were used: 70 kV, 120 mAs; 77 kV, 75 mAs; and 81 kV, 60 mAs. Subjective image quality was assessed using a phantom head. Storage phosphor (SP) images were printed on film and both analogue and SP images were assessed for their subjective image quality on a five-point rating scale. The results were statistically analysed using logistic regression analysis and chi(2) tests.
RESULTS: Highest organ doses were measured for the submandibular glands, followed by the parotid glands. Salivary gland doses tended to be higher at lower kV settings. Image quality was not statistically different for the different exposure settings. Imaging technique did not seem to influence diagnostic image quality, except for the periapical status of upper premolars where SP was better. The main reason for any differences appeared to be interobserver variation.
CONCLUSIONS: Analogue and SP panoramic radiography performed equally well for subjective diagnostic image quality. No significant differences could be found at the exposure settings used in this study. Radiation doses were highest for the salivary glands, especially at lower kV settings.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11641728     DOI: 10.1038/sj/dmfr/4600640

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  7 in total

1.  Subjective image quality of digital panoramic radiographs displayed on monitor and printed on various hardcopy media.

Authors:  Frieda Gijbels; Gerard Sanderink; Herman Pauwels; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2003-12-02       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Perception of anatomical structures in digitally filtered and conventional panoramic radiographs: a clinical evaluation.

Authors:  B G Baksi; E Alpöz; E Sogur; A Mert
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Development of a low-dose protocol for cone beam CT examinations of the anterior maxilla in children.

Authors:  Jose A Hidalgo Rivas; Keith Horner; Badri Thiruvenkatachari; Jonathan Davies; Chrysoula Theodorakou
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Thyroid Radiation Dose to Patients from Diagnostic Radiology Procedures over Eight Decades: 1930-2010.

Authors:  Lienard A Chang; Donald L Miller; Choonsik Lee; Dunstana R Melo; Daphnée Villoing; Vladimir Drozdovitch; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Sarah J Winters; Michael Labrake; Charles F Myers; Hyeyeun Lim; Cari M Kitahara; Martha S Linet; Steven L Simon
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 5.  The missing link in image quality assessment in digital dental radiography.

Authors:  Kazutoshi Okamura; Kazunori Yoshiura
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2019-07-13       Impact factor: 1.852

6.  An investigation into dose optimisation for imaging root canal anatomy using cone beam CT.

Authors:  Margarete B McGuigan; Christie Theodorakou; Henry F Duncan; Jonathan Davies; Anita Sengupta; Keith Horner
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-06-22       Impact factor: 2.419

7.  Sensitive Fibre-Based Thermoluminescence Detectors for High Resolution In-Vivo Dosimetry.

Authors:  Mostafa Ghomeishi; G Amouzad Mahdiraji; F R Mahamd Adikan; N M Ung; D A Bradley
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-08-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.