Literature DB >> 7485304

A multicenter randomized controlled trial of home uterine monitoring: active versus sham device. The Collaborative Home Uterine Monitoring Study (CHUMS) Group.

.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to determine the efficacy of a home uterine activity monitoring system for early detection of preterm labor and reduction of preterm birth. STUDY
DESIGN: A randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial was performed in which pregnant women between 24 and 36 weeks' gestation and at high risk for preterm labor or birth were assigned to receive twice daily nursing contact and home uterine activity monitoring with either active (data revealed) or sham (data concealed) devices. Study end points included mean cervical dilatation and its mean change from a previous visit at preterm labor diagnosis, preterm birth rate, and infant outcomes. Analysis of variance or logistic models including terms for site and group-by-site interaction effects were constructed for all variables.
RESULTS: Of 1355 patients enrolled, 1292 were randomized, 1165 used home uterine activity monitoring devices, and 842 (72.3%) completed the study. Both device groups had similar demographics, enrollment and delivery gestational ages, discontinuation rates, risk factors, birth weights, cervical dilatation at enrollment and at preterm labor diagnosis, change in cervical dilatation at preterm labor diagnosis, rates of preterm labor and birth, and neonatal intensive care requirements. Power to detect a difference in cervical dilatation > or = 1 cm at diagnosis of preterm labor was 0.99 for all risk factors.
CONCLUSIONS: Uterine activity data obtained from home uterine activity monitoring, when added to daily nursing contact, were not linked to earlier diagnosis of preterm labor or lower rates of preterm birth or neonatal morbidity in pregnancies at high risk for preterm labor and birth.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7485304     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91337-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  5 in total

1.  A preterm birth prevention project in Nova Scotia, Canada.

Authors:  B A Armson; L Dodds; C Cervin; S Christie-Haliburton; K Rinaldo
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2001-09

2.  A randomized trial of nurse specialist home care for women with high-risk pregnancies: outcomes and costs.

Authors:  D Brooten; J M Youngblut; L Brown; S A Finkler; D F Neff; E Madigan
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.229

Review 3.  Home uterine monitoring for detecting preterm labour.

Authors:  Christine Urquhart; Rosemary Currell; Francoise Harlow; Liz Callow
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-15

4.  Remote Monitoring of Hypertension Diseases in Pregnancy: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Dorien Lanssens; Thijs Vandenberk; Christophe Jp Smeets; Hélène De Cannière; Geert Molenberghs; Anne Van Moerbeke; Anne van den Hoogen; Tiziana Robijns; Sharona Vonck; Anneleen Staelens; Valerie Storms; Inge M Thijs; Lars Grieten; Wilfried Gyselaers
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 4.773

Review 5.  Effectiveness of Telemonitoring in Obstetrics: Scoping Review.

Authors:  Dorien Lanssens; Thijs Vandenberk; Inge M Thijs; Lars Grieten; Wilfried Gyselaers
Journal:  J Med Internet Res       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.428

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.