Literature DB >> 11604059

No evidence for chromosomal instability in radiation workers with in vivo exposure to plutonium.

C A Whitehouse1, E J Tawn.   

Abstract

The availability of cultured lymphocyte preparations from radiation workers with internal deposits of plutonium provided the opportunity to examine whether irradiation of bone marrow cells had induced a transmissible genomic instability manifesting as an increase in de novo chromosome aberrations in descendant cells in the peripheral blood. The men were originally classified as having more than 20% of the maximum permissible body burdens of plutonium, and recent red bone marrow dose calculations provided individual cumulative estimates at the time of sampling ranging up to 1.8 Sv. The initial sampling occurred approximately 10 years after the main major intake, and samples were subsequently taken during three further periods over the following 20 years. Control samples were available from three of the four sampling times. Chromosome analysis of solid Giemsa-stained material revealed no significant differences either in comparisons between the total group of plutonium workers and controls for comparable periods or when the comparisons were restricted to a group of plutonium workers with initial red bone marrow plutonium doses greater than 0.25 Sv. However, the frequencies of cells containing chromatid exchanges, chromatid breaks, and chromosome and chromatid gaps decreased significantly over the study period for both the plutonium workers as a whole and the controls, and a similar fluctuating pattern was seen when sequential samples from groups of the same individuals were examined. Cells with dicentrics, centric rings and excess acentric fragments remained at similar frequencies throughout the study period. There was therefore no evidence from the study of blood lymphocytes for the induction of persistent transmissible genomic instability in the bone marrow of radiation workers with internal deposits of plutonium. The work has, however, confirmed the need for appropriate controls when conducting studies of cytogenetic end points of instability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11604059     DOI: 10.1667/0033-7587(2001)156[0467:nefcii]2.0.co;2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  8 in total

1.  Intrachromosomal changes and genomic instability in site-specific microbeam-irradiated and bystander human-hamster hybrid cells.

Authors:  Burong Hu; Peter Grabham; Jing Nie; Adayabalam S Balajee; Hongning Zhou; Tom K Hei; Charles R Geard
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2011-11-11       Impact factor: 2.841

2.  Chromosome analysis in childhood cancer survivors and their offspring--no evidence for radiotherapy-induced persistent genomic instability.

Authors:  E Janet Tawn; Caroline A Whitehouse; Jeanette F Winther; Gillian B Curwen; Gwen S Rees; Marilyn Stovall; Jørgen H Olsen; Per Guldberg; Catherine Rechnitzer; Henrik Schrøder; John D Boice
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2005-06-06       Impact factor: 2.433

3.  Risks associated with low doses and low dose rates of ionizing radiation: why linearity may be (almost) the best we can do.

Authors:  Mark P Little; Richard Wakeford; E Janet Tawn; Simon D Bouffler; Amy Berrington de Gonzalez
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Seventeen-year follow-up study on chromosomal aberrations in five victims accidentally exposed to several Gy of 60Co gamma-rays.

Authors:  Ying Chen; Cui-Zhen Jin; Xue-Qing Zhang; Shi-Li Ge; Ze-Yun Zhang; Hui Xu; Xiu-Lin Liu; De-Chang Wu; Ping-Kun Zhou
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 1.925

5.  mFISH analysis of chromosome aberrations in workers occupationally exposed to mixed radiation.

Authors:  Natalia V Sotnik; Sergey V Osovets; Harry Scherthan; Tamara V Azizova
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2014-04-09       Impact factor: 1.925

6.  Dose and Time Dependence of Targeted and Untargeted Effects after Very Low Doses of α-Particle Irradiation of Human Lung Cancer Cells.

Authors:  A Belchior; O Monteiro Gil; P Almeida; P Vaz
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-11-22       Impact factor: 2.658

Review 7.  Do non-targeted effects increase or decrease low dose risk in relation to the linear-non-threshold (LNT) model?

Authors:  M P Little
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2010-01-25       Impact factor: 2.433

8.  The fate of a normal human cell traversed by a single charged particle.

Authors:  C Fournier; S Zahnreich; D Kraft; T Friedrich; K O Voss; M Durante; S Ritter
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.