Literature DB >> 11603439

Exercise hemodynamics of aortic prostheses: comparison between stentless bioprostheses and mechanical valves.

S Silberman1, J Shaheen, O Merin, D Fink, N Shapira, N Liviatan-Strauss, D Bitran.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Nonstented bioprostheses have been associated with lower resting gradients than stented bioprostheses or mechanical valves. We compared the hemodynamic performance of nonstented bioprostheses and mechanical valves with normal native aortic valves at rest and exercise.
METHODS: Dobutamine echocardiography was used to assess gradients and effective orifice area index at rest and exercise in patients with the Toronto stentless porcine valve (TSPV; n = 13; mean implant size 25.7 mm), Medtronic Freestyle (FR; n = 11; mean implant size 23.9 mm), Sorin Bicarbon (SOR; n = 11; mean implant size 24.5 mm), St. Jude Medical (SJM; n = 10; mean implant size 21.3 mm), and normal native aortic valves (NOR; n = 10).
RESULTS: All groups demonstrated a major rise in cardiac output at maximal dobutamine infusion. At rest and exercise, respectively, mean gradients were 5.48 +/- 1.1 mm Hg and 5.83 +/- 0.9 mm Hg for TSPV, 5.68 +/- 1.2 mm Hg and 7.50 +/- 1.7 mm Hg for FR, 10.29 +/- 1.4 mm Hg and 20.78 +/- 2.7 mm Hg for SJM, 5.26 +/- 0.8 mm Hg and 11.1 +/- 1.8 mm Hg for SOR, and 1.54 +/- 0.4 mm Hg and 2.18 +/- 0.7 mm Hg for NOR. In comparison with normal valves, both stentless groups showed no change in mean gradient at exercise, whereas both mechanical groups showed an increase in gradient at exercise (p < 0.04).
CONCLUSIONS: Stentless valves behave similarly to normal aortic valves in that there is almost no increase in gradient at exercise. Both mechanical valve groups showed increased gradients at exercise, suggesting that these valves obstruct blood flow. Our data add further evidence that stentless valves are hemodynamically superior to mechanical valves in the aortic position.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11603439     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03064-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg        ISSN: 0003-4975            Impact factor:   4.330


  8 in total

1.  Echocardiographic and hemodynamic characteristics of reconstructed bicuspid aortic valves at rest and exercise.

Authors:  C Schmidtke; D Poppe; G Dahmen; H-H Sievers
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-07

2.  Complications of prosthetic heart valves.

Authors:  Jeanne M Vesey; Catherine M Otto
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 3.  Heart valve replacement: which valve for which patient?

Authors:  Joseph Huh; Faisal Bakaeen
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 4.  Stentless aortic valve replacement: an update.

Authors:  Junjiro Kobayashi
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2011-06-02

5.  The Effect of Pulmonary Valve Replacement (PVR) Surgery on Hemodynamics of Patients Who Underwent Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF).

Authors:  Hamid Bigdelian; Davoud Mardani; Mohsen Sedighi
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Thorac Res       Date:  2015

6.  To fly as a pilot after cardiac surgery.

Authors:  Thomas Syburra; Ed Nicol; Stuart Mitchell; Denis Bron; Ulrich Rosendahl; John Pepper
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.191

7.  Non-coronary cardiac surgery and percutaneous cardiology procedures in aircrew.

Authors:  Norbert Guettler; Edward D Nicol; Joanna d'Arcy; Rienk Rienks; Dennis Bron; Eddie D Davenport; Olivier Manen; Gary Gray; Thomas Syburra
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Effect of surgeon on transprosthetic gradients after aortic valve replacement with Freestyle stentless bioprosthesis and its consequences: a follow-up study in 587 patients.

Authors:  Alexander Albert; Ines Florath; Ulrich Rosendahl; Wael Hassanein; Eberhard V Hodenberg; Stefan Bauer; Ina Ennker; Jürgen Ennker
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2007-10-05       Impact factor: 1.637

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.