Literature DB >> 15997344

Echocardiographic and hemodynamic characteristics of reconstructed bicuspid aortic valves at rest and exercise.

C Schmidtke1, D Poppe, G Dahmen, H-H Sievers.   

Abstract

Repair of diseased bicuspid aortic valves has gained increasing interest as an alternative to conventional valve replacement. Hemodynamic data at exercise have not been reported before. The aim of this study was to investigate the clinical and echocardiographic status of patients after bicuspid aortic valve repair at rest and exercise. Between 03/94 and 09/02 a reconstruction of an incompetent bicuspid aortic valve was performed in 25 patients (mean age 35+/-12.1 years, group A, mean insufficiency 2.8 preoperatively). Patients were investigated clinically and echocardiographically after 2.1+/-2.4 (0.1-8.9) years at rest and exercise and compared to 20 controls (group B). Clinical followup was complete. There were no deaths, reoperations, thromboembolic or bleeding complications. At last examination 21 patients were in NYHA class I, n=4 in NYHA class II and mean aortic valve insufficiency (AI) was 1.0 with one patient having an AI>II degrees. Maximum and mean pressure gradient (dPmax/mean) across the aortic valve at rest were 14+/-5.5/7+/-2.6 mmHg for patients of group A and 7+/-2.5/3.6+/-1.1 mmHg in group B. Mean AVA at rest was 2.6+/-0.8 (group A) vs 2.9+/-0.6 cm(2) (group B, p=0.025), valvular resistance 13.4+/-4.8 (group A) vs 13.6+/-2.9 dyn x s x cm(-5) (group B, p>0.05). All individuals were stressed up to 100 W (dPmax/mean 21+/-6.8/11+/-3.6, group A vs 11+/-2.9/6+/-1.3 mmHg, group B). 56% of group A and 85% of group B could be stressed up to 175 W with dPmax/mean 24.5+/-8.3/12+/-4.2 and 16+/-3.6/8+/-1.4 mmHg, respectively (p<0. 01). Heart rate and blood pressure behavior were comparable. Left ventricular mass regression (preoperatively 369.3+/-76.4 vs 277.3+/-80.7 g at last examination, p<0.01) was significant in group A but did not reach normal values (group B, 227.8+/-71.1; p<0.01). Bicuspid aortic valve reconstruction reduces left ventricular volume load significantly. Although residual mild subclinical obstruction and incompetence were observed, the behavior of hemodynamics at exercise was comparable to controls. The clinical relevance of these findings in long term follow-up has to be evaluated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15997344     DOI: 10.1007/s00392-005-0241-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Z Kardiol        ISSN: 0300-5860


  30 in total

1.  Comparison of exercise hemodynamics among nonstented aortic bioprostheses, mechanical valves, and normal native aortic valves.

Authors:  S Silberman; J Shaheen; D Fink; D Tzivoni; D Rosenmann; N Shapira; N Strauss-Liviatan; D Bitran
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.620

2.  Comparison of aortic valve gradient during exercise after aortic valve reconstruction.

Authors:  T P Graeter; M Kindermann; R Fries; F Langer; H J Schäfers
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 9.410

3.  The congenitally bicuspid aortic valve: how does it function? Why does it fail?

Authors:  Francis Robicsek; Mano J Thubrikar; Joseph W Cook; Brett Fowler
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.330

4.  Hemodynamic performance at rest and during exercise after aortic valve replacement: comparison of pulmonary autografts versus aortic homografts.

Authors:  Isabelle Laforest; Jean G Dumesnil; Martin Briand; Paul C Cartier; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2002-09-24       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Surgical correction of aortic insufficiency associated with ventricular septal defect.

Authors:  A STARR; V MENASHE; C DOTTER
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1960-07

6.  Indications and limitations of aortic valve reconstruction.

Authors:  C Duran; N Kumar; B Gometza; Z al Halees
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Repair of ventricular septal defect with aortic insufficiency.

Authors:  G A Trusler; C A Moes; B S Kidd
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 5.209

8.  Hemodynamics of semilunar valves at rest and exercise at an average of more than two years after the Ross procedure.

Authors:  H H Sievers; C Schmidtke; B Graf
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2001-03

9.  Is repair of aortic valve regurgitation a safe alternative to valve replacement?

Authors:  Kenji Minakata; Hartzell V Schaff; Kenton J Zehr; Joseph A Dearani; Richard C Daly; Thomas A Orszulak; Francisco J Puga; Gordon K Danielson
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  [Status of aortic valve reconstruction and Ross operation in aortic valve diseases].

Authors:  Hans H Sievers
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 1.443

View more
  4 in total

1.  Midterm follow-up dynamic echocardiography evaluation after aortic valve repair for aortic valve insufficiency.

Authors:  Giuseppe D'Ancona; Andrea Amaducci; John Prodromo; Francesco Pirone; Marco Follis; Calogero Falletta; Michele Pilato
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-02-24

2.  Bicuspid aortic valve.

Authors:  D Horstkotte
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2005-07

Review 3.  Heart valve function: a biomechanical perspective.

Authors:  Michael S Sacks; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 4.  Heart Valve Biomechanics and Underlying Mechanobiology.

Authors:  Salma Ayoub; Giovanni Ferrari; Robert C Gorman; Joseph H Gorman; Frederick J Schoen; Michael S Sacks
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 9.090

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.