The occurrence and mechanisms of innate immunity against parasites in fish.

Parasitic infections in teleost fish are limited by constitutive innate defence mechanisms that render the host refractory or reduce the severity of infection. Controlled challenge trials using naive animals provide indirect evidence of innate immunity as well as identifying the host range or specificity of a parasite, often when specific details of defence mechanism(s) are lacking. Examples of parasites for which innate immunity may be inferred from cross-infectivity studies include Gyrodactylus spp., Lepeophtheirus salmonis, Cryptobia spp., Trypanosoma spp., Ceratomyxa shasta, Myxobolus cerebralis and Kudoa thyrsites. Recent studies however, have begun to clarify the relative roles of innate and acquired immunity against parasitic infection in teleosts by recognizing the presence and significance of specific innate effector mechanisms. The physico-chemical characeristics of skin mucus, the presence of bioactive substances including lysozyme, complement, C-reactive protein, haemolysins and lectins and the epidermal migration of inflammatory cells and their secretions may affect the establishment and proliferation of ectoparasitic copepods, ciliates or monogenea. Similarly in refractory species, haematozoic parasites are lysed via the alternative complement pathway and in susceptible and refractory hosts, protease inhibitors associated with the plasma neutralize proteolytic virulence factors. Detailed knowledge of innate resistance mechanisms against histiozoic parasites are lacking although non-specific cytotoxic lymphoid cells and macrophages probably play a role. The demonstration in certain disease models that innate resistance traits are under genetic control and may be inherited in a simple Mendelian fashion suggests opportunities for selective breeding for resistance against parasitic disease. Beyond a small number of well-described models however, research programs focussing on innate immunity against parasites in fish are lacking. Given the relative importance of innate immunity in fish, particularly as disease losses continue to have an economic impact in aquaculture, this area deserves considerable attention.