Literature DB >> 8931195

The use of sampling weights for survey data analysis.

D Pfeffermann1.   

Abstract

The use of the sampling weights when fitting models to complex survey data is considered. It is shown that when the sample is selected with unequal selection probabilities that are related to the values of the response variables even after conditioning on all the available design information, ignoring the sample selection scheme in the inference process, can yield misleading results. Probability weighting of the sample observations yields consistent estimators of the model parameters and protects against model misspecification, although in a limited sense. Other methods of incorporating the sampling weights in the inference process are discussed and compared to the use of probability weighting.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8931195     DOI: 10.1177/096228029600500303

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res        ISSN: 0962-2802            Impact factor:   3.021


  25 in total

1.  The competing effects of disease states on quality of life of the elderly: the case of urinary symptoms in men.

Authors:  B Mozes; Y Maor; A Shmueli
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 4.147

2.  Factors influencing unexpected disposition after orthopedic ambulatory surgery.

Authors:  Stavros G Memtsoudis; Yan Ma; Cephas P Swamidoss; Alison M Edwards; Madhu Mazumdar; Gregory A Liguori
Journal:  J Clin Anesth       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 9.452

3.  Child welfare agency ties to providers and schools and substance abuse treatment use by adolescents.

Authors:  Rebecca Wells; Emmeline Chuang; Lindsey E Haynes; I-Heng Lee; Yu Bai
Journal:  J Subst Abuse Treat       Date:  2010-09-25

4.  MEScan: a powerful statistical framework for genome-scale mutual exclusivity analysis of cancer mutations.

Authors:  Sisheng Liu; Jinpeng Liu; Yanqi Xie; Tingting Zhai; Eugene W Hinderer; Arnold J Stromberg; Nathan L Vanderford; Jill M Kolesar; Hunter N B Moseley; Li Chen; Chunming Liu; Chi Wang
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Familial interactions and physical, lifestyle, and dietary factors to affect bone mineral density of children in the KNHANES 2009-2010.

Authors:  Sunmin Park; Chung-Yill Park; Jung-O Ham; Byung-Kook Lee
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2013-09-20       Impact factor: 2.626

6.  Farmers' preferences for nutrient and climate-related agri-environmental schemes: A cross-country comparison.

Authors:  Berit Hasler; Mikolaj Czajkowski; Katarina Elofsson; Line Block Hansen; Maria Theresia Konrad; Helle Ørsted Nielsen; Olli Niskanen; Tea Nõmmann; Anders Branth Pedersen; Kaja Peterson; Helen Poltimäe; Tobias Häggmark Svensson; Katarzyna Zagórska
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2019-10-17       Impact factor: 5.129

7.  Using threshold regression to analyze survival data from complex surveys: With application to mortality linked NHANES III Phase II genetic data.

Authors:  Yan Li; Tao Xiao; Dandan Liao; Mei-Ling Ting Lee
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Work correlates of back problems and activity restriction due to musculoskeletal disorders in the Canadian national population health survey (NPHS) 1994-5 data.

Authors:  D C Cole; S A Ibrahim; H S Shannon; F Scott; J Eyles
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 4.402

9.  Who wants a free brain scan? Assessing and correcting for recruitment biases in a population-based sMRI pilot study.

Authors:  Mary Ganguli; Ching-Wen Lee; Tiffany Hughes; Beth E Snitz; Jennifer Jakubcak; Ranjan Duara; Chung-Chou H Chang
Journal:  Brain Imaging Behav       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.978

10.  Model Averaging Methods for Weight Trimming.

Authors:  Michael R Elliott
Journal:  J Off Stat       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 0.920

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.