Literature DB >> 30503985

Specificity and variability of trunk kinematics on a mechanical horse.

Adam D Goodworth1, Cody Barrett2, Jonathan Rylander2, Brian Garner2.   

Abstract

As perturbation training is gaining popularity, it is important to better understand postural control during complex three-dimensional stimuli. One clinically relevant and commonly used three-dimensional stimulus is found in hippotherapy and simulated hippotherapy on a mechanical horse. We tested nine healthy participants on a horse simulator, measured head and trunk kinematics, and characterized data in time (root-mean-square and variability) and frequency (amplitude spectra, gains, and phases) domains. We addressed three fundamental questions: 1) What is the specificity of postural responses to the simulator? 2) Which plane of motion is associated with the most and least variability (repeatable movements across repeated stimuli and across participants)? 3) To what extent are postural responses influenced by different degrees of stability (addition of pelvis straps and trunk support)? We found head and trunk responses were highly specific to the three-dimensional simulator perturbation direction and frequency. Frontal plane responses had the least variability across repetitions and participants whereas transverse motion was most variable. Head motion was more variable than the trunk at low frequencies and exhibited a marked decrease in tilt in the sagittal plane. Finally, the inclusion of pelvis straps had minimal effect on kinematics at low frequencies but altered higher frequencies; whereas added trunk support reduced head and trunk responses to perturbations and altered timing characteristics in all three planes. In conclusion, the present study suggests that frontal plane motion was under a high level of control, and results support the idea that specific head and trunk postural responses can be elicited from a complex three-dimensional stimuli, such as those found in hippotherapy. Researchers and clinicians can use results from this study to help interpret variability, implement mechanical adjustments to stability, and assess responses in pathological populations.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Frequency domain; Head; Hippotherapy; Mechanical horse; Posture; Trunk

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30503985      PMCID: PMC6342638          DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2018.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Mov Sci        ISSN: 0167-9457            Impact factor:   2.161


  52 in total

Review 1.  Motor control strategies revealed in the structure of motor variability.

Authors:  Mark L Latash; John P Scholz; Gregor Schöner
Journal:  Exerc Sport Sci Rev       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.230

2.  Transitions in a postural task: do the recruitment and suppression of degrees of freedom stabilize posture?

Authors:  J J Buchanan; F B Horak
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The influence of postural threat on the control of upright stance.

Authors:  M G Carpenter; J S Frank; C P Silcher; G W Peysar
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Forward versus backward walking: transfer of podokinetic adaptation.

Authors:  G M Earhart; G M Jones; F B Horak; E W Block; K D Weber; W A Fletcher
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Cross-validation of marker configurations to measure pelvic kinematics in gait.

Authors:  Lutz Vogt; Martin Portscher; Kirsten Brettmann; Klaus Pfeifer; Winfried Banzer
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 6.  Motor schema theory after 27 years: reflections and implications for a new theory.

Authors:  Richard A Schmidt
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.500

7.  Sensorimotor integration in human postural control.

Authors:  R J Peterka
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Mechanical horseback riding improves insulin sensitivity in elder diabetic patients.

Authors:  Masakazu Kubota; Masaru Nagasaki; Mizuho Tokudome; Youichi Shinomiya; Takahisa Ozawa; Yuzo Sato
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2005-08-18       Impact factor: 5.602

9.  Relation between age, femoral neck cortical stability, and hip fracture risk.

Authors:  Paul M Mayhew; C David Thomas; John G Clement; Nigel Loveridge; Thomas J Beck; William Bonfield; Chris J Burgoyne; Jonathan Reeve
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 Jul 9-15       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Interlimb coordination during locomotion: what can be adapted and stored?

Authors:  Darcy S Reisman; Hannah J Block; Amy J Bastian
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-06-15       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Effects of Equine-Assisted Therapies or Horse-Riding Simulators on Chronic Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Daniel Collado-Mateo; Ana Myriam Lavín-Pérez; Juan Pedro Fuentes García; Miguel Ángel García-Gordillo; Santos Villafaina
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-08-31       Impact factor: 2.430

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.