Literature DB >> 11599073

Safety of metallic implants in magnetic resonance imaging.

H S Ho1.   

Abstract

Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has become a commonly accepted medical procedure. Manufacturers of medical implant devices are submitting claims that their devices are safe and effective in a MR environment. This paper concentrates on the issue of heating of patients due to the interaction of metallic implants with the strong radiofrequency (RF) magnetic field produced by the MR scanner. The commercially available program XFDTD was used to calculate the specific absorption rate (SAR) distribution in a realistic model of the human body. The body contained a metallic implant and was exposed to RF magnetic fields at 64 MHz from a model of a MR birdcage body coil. The results of the calculation showed that the magnitude of the increased heating of tissues due to the presence of the metallic implant depended on the dimensions, orientation, shape, and location of the metallic implant in the patient. This increased heating of surrounding tissues primarily concentrates in a small volume near the tip of the metallic wire. When the whole-body SAR was normalized to 1 W/kg, a calculated value of 41 W/kg was obtained at this location if the absorption was averaged over 1 g of tissue. However, a maximum value of 310 W/kg was calculated when the absorption was averaged over 1/8 g of tissue. Published 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11599073     DOI: 10.1002/jmri.1209

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging        ISSN: 1053-1807            Impact factor:   4.813


  11 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging of patients with airway stents.

Authors:  Yang Xia; Rui Jin; Wen Li; Huahao Shen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Analysis of the role of lead resistivity in specific absorption rate for deep brain stimulator leads at 3T MRI.

Authors:  Leonardo M Angelone; Jyrki Ahveninen; John W Belliveau; Giorgio Bonmassar
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2010-03-22       Impact factor: 10.048

3.  Safety of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with cardiovascular implants and devices.

Authors:  S K Prasad; D J Pennell
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Is there a way to diagnose spinal instability in acute burst fractures by performing ultrasound?

Authors:  T Vordemvenne; R Hartensuer; L Löhrer; V Vieth; T Fuchs; M J Raschke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-23       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  A cadaveric study on sacroiliac joint injection.

Authors:  Yu-Cong Zou; Yi-Kai Li; Cheng-Fu Yu; Xian-Wen Yang; Run-Qi Chen
Journal:  Int Surg       Date:  2015-02

6.  MRI Conditional Actively Tracked Metallic Electrophysiology Catheters and Guidewires With Miniature Tethered Radio-Frequency Traps: Theory, Design, and Validation.

Authors:  Akbar Alipour; Eric S Meyer; Charles L Dumoulin; Ronald D Watkins; Hassan Elahi; Wolfgang Loew; Jeffrey Schweitzer; Gregory Olson; Yue Chen; Susumu Tao; Michael Guttman; Aravindan Kolandaivelu; Henry R Halperin; Ehud J Schmidt
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 4.538

7.  Computational electromagnetic analysis in a human head model with EEG electrodes and leads exposed to RF-field sources at 915 MHz and 1748 MHz.

Authors:  Leonardo M Angelone; Giorgi Bit-Babik; Chung-Kwang Chou
Journal:  Radiat Res       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.841

8.  RF Safety Evaluation of a Breast Tissue Expander Device for MRI: Numerical Simulation and Experiment.

Authors:  Bu S Park; Amir Razjouyan; Leonardo M Angelone; Brent McCright; Sunder S Rajan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.006

9.  MRI-based multiscale model for electromagnetic analysis in the human head with implanted DBS.

Authors:  Maria Ida Iacono; Nikos Makris; Luca Mainardi; Leonardo M Angelone; Giorgio Bonmassar
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2013-07-15       Impact factor: 2.238

Review 10.  Biological effects of exposure to magnetic resonance imaging: an overview.

Authors:  Domenico Formica; Sergio Silvestri
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2004-04-22       Impact factor: 2.819

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.