Literature DB >> 11595121

What is the ideal duration of adjuvant therapy for primary breast cancer: are four cycles of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin enough?

L N Shulman1.   

Abstract

For 25 years we have known that adjuvant chemotherapy improves both disease-free and overall survival for many of our patients with primary breast cancer. We also know that these therapies have significant toxicities and are not always effective. We have therefore focused a great deal of effort into maximizing the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy and defining just how much chemotherapy, with respect to both dose and duration, is necessary to achieve this maximum benefit. In our attempt to define these parameters through clinical trials, we have been faced with many options, and we may not yet have defined an optimal regimen of chemotherapy, or an optimal duration. Although many physicians in the United States consider four cycles of cyclophosphamide and doxorubicin as "standard of care" for patients with primary breast cancer, many feel that both choice of regimen and duration of treatment remain controversial. The reasons for this uncertainty and lack of clarity are complex, and they are addressed in this review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11595121     DOI: 10.1007/s11912-001-0074-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep        ISSN: 1523-3790            Impact factor:   5.075


  17 in total

1.  Duration and reintroduction of adjuvant chemotherapy for node-positive premenopausal breast cancer patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Randomized 2 x 2 trial evaluating hormonal treatment and the duration of chemotherapy in node-positive breast cancer patients: an update based on 10 years' follow-up. German Breast Cancer Study Group.

Authors:  W Sauerbrei; G Bastert; H Bojar; C Beyerle; R L Neumann; C Schmoor; M Schumacher
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Phase III trial comparing two dose levels of epirubicin combined with cyclophosphamide with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in node-positive breast cancer.

Authors:  M J Piccart; A Di Leo; M Beauduin; A Vindevoghel; J Michel; C Focan; A Tagnon; F Ries; P Gobert; C Finet; M T Closon-Dejardin; J P Dufrane; J Kerger; F Liebens; S Beauvois; S Bartholomeus; S Dolci; J P Lobelle; M Paesmans; J M Nogaret
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-06-15       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Increased intensification and total dose of cyclophosphamide in a doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen for the treatment of primary breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-22.

Authors:  B Fisher; S Anderson; D L Wickerham; A DeCillis; N Dimitrov; E Mamounas; N Wolmark; R Pugh; J N Atkins; F J Meyers; N Abramson; J Wolter; R S Bornstein; L Levy; E H Romond; V Caggiano; M Grimaldi; P Jochimsen; P Deckers
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Further evaluation of intensified and increased total dose of cyclophosphamide for the treatment of primary breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-25.

Authors:  B Fisher; S Anderson; A DeCillis; N Dimitrov; J N Atkins; L Fehrenbacher; P H Henry; E H Romond; K S Lanier; E Davila; C G Kardinal; L Laufman; H I Pierce; N Abramson; A M Keller; J T Hamm; D L Wickerham; M Begovic; E Tan-Chiu; W Tian; N Wolmark
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Two months of doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide with and without interval reinduction therapy compared with 6 months of cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in positive-node breast cancer patients with tamoxifen-nonresponsive tumors: results from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-15.

Authors:  B Fisher; A M Brown; N V Dimitrov; R Poisson; C Redmond; R G Margolese; D Bowman; N Wolmark; D L Wickerham; C G Kardinal
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Randomized trial of intensive cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy compared with cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil in premenopausal women with node-positive breast cancer. National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

Authors:  M N Levine; V H Bramwell; K I Pritchard; B D Norris; L E Shepherd; H Abu-Zahra; B Findlay; D Warr; D Bowman; J Myles; A Arnold; T Vandenberg; R MacKenzie; J Robert; J Ottaway; M Burnell; C K Williams; D Tu
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Adjuvant treatment of node-positive breast cancer with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, fluorouracil, and vincristine versus cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil: final report after a 16-year median follow-up duration.

Authors:  J L Misset; M di Palma; M Delgado; R Plagne; P Chollet; P Fumoleau; B Le Mevel; D Belpomme; J Guerrin; P Fargeot; R Metz; M Ithzaki; C Hill; G Mathé
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  One versus 2 years of CMFVP adjuvant chemotherapy in axillary node-positive and estrogen receptor-negative patients: a Southwest Oncology Group study.

Authors:  S E Rivkin; S Green; B Metch; W R Jewell; J J Costanzi; S J Altman; J P Minton; R M O'Bryan; C K Osborne
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Adjuvant cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil versus fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide chemotherapy in premenopausal women with axillary node-positive operable breast cancer: results of a randomized trial. The International Collaborative Cancer Group.

Authors:  R C Coombes; J M Bliss; J Wils; F Morvan; M Espié; D Amadori; P Gambrosier; M Richards; M Aapro; A Villar-Grimalt; C McArdle; F R Pérez-López; P Vassilopoulos; E P Ferreira; C E Chilvers; G Coombes; E M Woods; M Marty
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.