Literature DB >> 9164196

Increased intensification and total dose of cyclophosphamide in a doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen for the treatment of primary breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-22.

B Fisher, S Anderson, D L Wickerham, A DeCillis, N Dimitrov, E Mamounas, N Wolmark, R Pugh, J N Atkins, F J Meyers, N Abramson, J Wolter, R S Bornstein, L Levy, E H Romond, V Caggiano, M Grimaldi, P Jochimsen, P Deckers.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) initiated a randomized trial (B-22) to determine if intensifying but maintaining the total dose of cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan, Bristol-Myers Squibb Oncology, Princeton, NJ) in a doxorubicin (Adriamycin, Pharmacia, Kalamazoo, MI)-cyclophosphamide combination (AC), or if intensifying and increasing the total dose of cyclophosphamide improves the outcome of women with primary breast cancer and positive axillary nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 2,305) were randomized to receive either four courses of standard AC therapy (group 1); intensified therapy, in which the same total dose of cyclophosphamide was administered in two courses (group 2); or intensified and increased therapy, in which the total dose of cyclophosphamide was doubled (group 3). The dose and intensity of doxorubicin were similar in all groups. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival were determined using life-table estimates.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference in DFS (P = .30) or overall survival (P = .95) among the groups through 5 years. At 5 years, the DFS of women in group 1 was similar to that of women in group 2 (62% v 60%, respectively; P = .43) and to that of women in group 3 (62% v 64%, respectively; P = .59). The 5-year survival of women in group 1 was similar to that of women in group 2 (78% v 77%, respectively; P = .86) and to that of women in group 3 (78% v 77%, respectively; P = .82). Grade 4 toxicity increased in groups 2 and 3. Failure to note a difference in outcome among the groups was unrelated to either differences in amount and intensity of cyclophosphamide or to dose delays and intervals between courses of therapy.
CONCLUSION: Intensifying or intensifying and increasing the total dose of cyclophosphamide failed to significantly improve either DFS or overall survival in any group. It was concluded that, outside of a clinical trial, dose-intensification of cyclophosphamide in an AC combination represents inappropriate therapy for women with primary breast cancer.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9164196     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1997.15.5.1858

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  48 in total

Review 1.  [Role of high-dose chemotherapy in hematology and internal medicine/ oncology].

Authors:  A Engert; A Josting; M Reiser; D Söhngen; V Diehl
Journal:  Med Klin (Munich)       Date:  1999-08-15

Review 2.  High-dose chemotherapy and stem cell support for breast cancer: where are we now?

Authors:  Renee M Gerrero; Steven Stein; Edward A Stadtmauer
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 3.  Current challenges for the early clinical development of anticancer drugs in the era of molecularly targeted agents.

Authors:  Christophe Le Tourneau; Véronique Diéras; Patricia Tresca; Wulfran Cacheux; Xavier Paoletti
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2010-04-02       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 4.  Adjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer.

Authors:  Monica Fornier; Clifford Hudis
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.075

5.  Incidence of febrile neutropenia among early-stage breast cancer patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Alexandre Chan; Christy Chen; Joen Chiang; Sze Huey Tan; Raymond Ng
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2011-08-05       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Population-based assessment of hospitalizations for toxicity from chemotherapy in older women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Xianglin L Du; Cynthia Osborne; James S Goodwin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Breast Cancer OncoGuia.

Authors:  Paula Manchon; Josep M Borràs; Tàrsila Ferro; Josep Alfons Espinàs
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.405

8.  Recent advances in the systemic therapy of breast cancer.

Authors:  J T Cole
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2000-01

9.  Cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, and Fluorouracil versus dose-dense epirubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by Paclitaxel versus Doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide followed by Paclitaxel in node-positive or high-risk node-negative breast cancer.

Authors:  Margot Burnell; Mark N Levine; Judith-Anne W Chapman; Vivien Bramwell; Karen Gelmon; Barbara Walley; Ted Vandenberg; Haji Chalchal; Kathy S Albain; Edith A Perez; Hope Rugo; Kathleen Pritchard; Patti O'Brien; Lois E Shepherd
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-11-09       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Outcome of patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with doxorubicin-based adjuvant chemotherapy as a function of HER2 and TOP2A status.

Authors:  Raymond Tubbs; William E Barlow; G Thomas Budd; Eric Swain; Peggy Porter; Allen Gown; I-Ten Yeh; George Sledge; Charles Shapiro; James Ingle; Charles Haskell; Kathy S Albain; Robert Livingston; Daniel F Hayes
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-07-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.