Literature DB >> 11595103

How does the brain discriminate familiar and unfamiliar faces?: a PET study of face categorical perception.

B Rossion1, C Schiltz, L Robaye, D Pirenne, M Crommelinck.   

Abstract

Where and how does the brain discriminate familiar and unfamiliar faces? This question has not been answered yet by neuroimaging studies partly because different tasks were performed on familiar and unfamiliar faces, or because familiar faces were associated with semantic and lexical information. Here eight subjects were trained during 3 days with a set of 30 faces. The familiarized faces were morphed with unfamiliar faces. Presented with continua of unfamiliar and familiar faces in a pilot experiment, a group of eight subjects presented a categorical perception of face familiarity: there was a sharp boundary in percentage of familiarity decisions between 40% and 60% faces. In the main experiment, subjects were scanned (PET) on the fourth day (after 3 days of training) in six conditions, all requiring a sex classification task. Completely novel faces (0%) were presented in Condition 1 and familiar faces (100%) in Condition 6, while faces of steps of 20% in the continuum of familiarity were presented in Conditions 2 to 5 (20% to 80%). A principal component analysis (PCA) indicated that most variations in neural responses were related to the dissociation between faces perceived as familiar (60% to 100%) and faces perceived as unfamiliar (0 to 40%). Subtraction analyses did not disclose any increase of activation for faces perceived as familiar while there were large relative increases for faces perceived as unfamiliar in several regions of the right occipito-temporal visual pathway. These changes were all categorical and were observed mainly in the right middle occipital gyrus, the right posterior fusiform gyrus, and the right inferotemporal cortex. These results show that (1) the discrimination between familiar and unfamiliar faces is related to relative increases in the right ventral pathway to unfamiliar/novel faces; (2) familiar and unfamiliar faces are discriminated in an all-or-none fashion rather than proportionally to their resemblance to stored representations; and (3) categorical perception of faces is associated with abrupt changes of brain activity in the regions that discriminate the two extremes of the multidimensional continuum.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11595103     DOI: 10.1162/089892901753165917

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.225


  19 in total

1.  The multiple neural networks of familiarity: A meta-analysis of functional imaging studies.

Authors:  Mathilde Horn; Renaud Jardri; Fabien D'Hondt; Guillaume Vaiva; Pierre Thomas; Delphine Pins
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Atypical categorical perception in autism: autonomy of discrimination?

Authors:  Isabelle Soulières; Laurent Mottron; Daniel Saumier; Serge Larochelle
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2007-03

3.  Guided saccades modulate object and face-specific activity in the fusiform gyrus.

Authors:  James P Morris; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  A face-selective ventral occipito-temporal map of the human brain with intracerebral potentials.

Authors:  Jacques Jonas; Corentin Jacques; Joan Liu-Shuang; Hélène Brissart; Sophie Colnat-Coulbois; Louis Maillard; Bruno Rossion
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-06-27       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Reference repulsion in the categorical perception of biological motion.

Authors:  Timothy D Sweeny; Steve Haroz; David Whitney
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2012-05-23       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Common neural systems associated with the recognition of famous faces and names: an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  Kristy A Nielson; Michael Seidenberg; John L Woodard; Sally Durgerian; Qi Zhang; William L Gross; Amelia Gander; Leslie M Guidotti; Piero Antuono; Stephen M Rao
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Adaptation effects of highly familiar faces: immediate and long lasting.

Authors:  Claus-Christian Carbon; Tilo Strobach; Stephen R H Langton; Géza Harsányi; Helmut Leder; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

8.  Distinct neural processes for the perception of familiar versus unfamiliar faces along the visual hierarchy revealed by EEG.

Authors:  Elliot Collins; Amanda K Robinson; Marlene Behrmann
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2018-06-30       Impact factor: 6.556

9.  Shared or separate mechanisms for self-face and other-face processing? Evidence from adaptation.

Authors:  Brendan Rooney; Helen Keyes; Nuala Brady
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2012-03-07

10.  Identification and classification of facial familiarity in directed lying: an ERP study.

Authors:  Delin Sun; Chetwyn C H Chan; Tatia M C Lee
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.