Literature DB >> 12368240

Retroelement distributions in the human genome: variations associated with age and proximity to genes.

Patrik Medstrand1, Louie N van de Lagemaat, Dixie L Mager.   

Abstract

Remnants of more than 3 million transposable elements, primarily retroelements, comprise nearly half of the human genome and have generated much speculation concerning their evolutionary significance. We have exploited the draft human genome sequence to examine the distributions of retroelements on a genome-wide scale. Here we show that genomic densities of 10 major classes of human retroelements are distributed differently with respect to surrounding GC content and also show that the oldest elements are preferentially found in regions of lower GC compared with their younger relatives. In addition, we determined whether retroelement densities with respect to genes could be accurately predicted based on surrounding GC content or if genes exert independent effects on the density distributions. This analysis revealed that all classes of long terminal repeat (LTR) retroelements and L1 elements, particularly those in the same orientation as the nearest gene, are significantly underrepresented within genes and older LTR elements are also underrepresented in regions within 5 kb of genes. Thus, LTR elements have been excluded from gene regions, likely because of their potential to affect gene transcription. In contrast, the density of Alu sequences in the proximity of genes is significantly greater than that predicted based on the surrounding GC content. Furthermore, we show that the previously described density shift of Alu repeats with age to domains of higher GC was markedly delayed on the Y chromosome, suggesting that recombination between chromosome pairs greatly facilitates genomic redistributions of retroelements. These findings suggest that retroelements can be removed from the genome, possibly through recombination resulting in re-creation of insert-free alleles. Such a process may provide an explanation for the shifting distributions of retroelements with time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12368240      PMCID: PMC187529          DOI: 10.1101/gr.388902

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Res        ISSN: 1088-9051            Impact factor:   9.043


  42 in total

1.  Retrotransposons as epigenetic mediators of phenotypic variation in mammals.

Authors:  E Whitelaw; D I Martin
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 2.  The structure and function of retroviral long terminal repeats.

Authors:  J Majors
Journal:  Curr Top Microbiol Immunol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.291

3.  Transposable element distribution in Drosophila.

Authors:  C Biémont; A Tsitrone; C Vieira; C Hoogland
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 4.  Mobile elements inserted in the distant past have taken on important functions.

Authors:  R J Britten
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1997-12-31       Impact factor: 3.688

5.  Intragenomic distribution and stability of transposable elements in euchromatin and heterochromatin of Drosophila melanogaster: elements with inverted repeats Bari 1, hobo, and pogo.

Authors:  C Di Franco; A Terrinoni; P Dimitri; N Junakovic
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  The Y chromosome: a graveyard for endogenous retroviruses.

Authors:  C Kjellman; H O Sjögren; B Widegren
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1995-08-19       Impact factor: 3.688

7.  Evolution of different subfamilies of mariner elements within the medfly genome inferred from abundance and chromosomal distribution.

Authors:  C Torti; L M Gomulski; D Moralli; E Raimondi; H M Robertson; P Capy; G Gasperi; A R Malacrida
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.316

8.  Identification and characterization of novel human endogenous retrovirus families by phylogenetic screening of the human genome mapping project database.

Authors:  M Tristem
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 5.103

Review 9.  Cytosine methylation and the ecology of intragenomic parasites.

Authors:  J A Yoder; C P Walsh; T H Bestor
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 11.639

10.  Identification of a new, abundant superfamily of mammalian LTR-transposons.

Authors:  A F Smit
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1993-04-25       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  165 in total

1.  Controlling integration specificity of a yeast retrotransposon.

Authors:  Yunxia Zhu; Junbiao Dai; Peter G Fuerst; Daniel F Voytas
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Duplication, coclustering, and selection of human Alu retrotransposons.

Authors:  Jerzy Jurka; Oleksiy Kohany; Adam Pavlicek; Vladimir V Kapitonov; Michael V Jurka
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-01-21       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Patterns of sequence conservation at termini of long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons and DNA transposons in the human genome: lessons from phage Mu.

Authors:  Insuk Lee; Rasika M Harshey
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2003-08-01       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  Large-scale determination of the methylation status of retrotransposons in different tissues using a methylation tags approach.

Authors:  Konstantin Khodosevich; Yuri Lebedev; Eugene D Sverdlov
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-02-18       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Degradation of the Repetitive Genomic Landscape in a Close Relative of Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Gavin C Woodruff; Anastasia A Teterina
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Evolution and functional classification of vertebrate gene deserts.

Authors:  Ivan Ovcharenko; Gabriela G Loots; Marcelo A Nobrega; Ross C Hardison; Webb Miller; Lisa Stubbs
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2004-12-08       Impact factor: 9.043

7.  The biased distribution of Alus in human isochores might be driven by recombination.

Authors:  Michael Hackenberg; Pedro Bernaola-Galván; Pedro Carpena; José L Oliver
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  L1 integration in a transgenic mouse model.

Authors:  Daria V Babushok; Eric M Ostertag; Christine E Courtney; Janice M Choi; Haig H Kazazian
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2005-12-19       Impact factor: 9.043

9.  Epigenetic interplay between mouse endogenous retroviruses and host genes.

Authors:  Rita Rebollo; Katharine Miceli-Royer; Ying Zhang; Sharareh Farivar; Liane Gagnier; Dixie L Mager
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 13.583

Review 10.  Unveiling Human Non-Random Genome Editing Mechanisms Activated in Response to Chronic Environmental Changes: I. Where Might These Mechanisms Come from and What Might They Have Led To?

Authors:  Loris Zamai
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 6.600

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.