Literature DB >> 11590593

Comparative and functional anatomy of the mammalian lumbar spine.

B M Boszczyk1, A A Boszczyk, R Putz.   

Abstract

As an essential organ of both weight bearing and locomotion, the spine is subject to the conflict of providing maximal stability while maintaining crucial mobility, in addition to maintaining the integrity of the neural structures. Comparative morphological adaptation of the lumbar spine of mammals, especially in respect to locomotion, has however received only limited scientific attention. Specialised features of the human lumbar spine, have therefore not been adequately highlighted through comparative anatomy. Mathematical averages were determined of 14 measurements taken on each lumbar vertebrae of ten mammalian species (human, chimpanzee, orang-utan, kangaroo, dolphin, seal, Przewalski's horse, cheetah, lama, ibex). The revealed traits are analysed with respect to the differing spinal loading patterns. All examined mammalian lumbar spines suggest an exact accommodation to specific biomechanical demands. The lumbar spine has reacted to flexion in a predominant plane with narrowing of the vertebral bodies in quadrupeds. Torsion of the lumbar spine is withstood by an increase in the transverse distance between the inferior articular processes in the upper lumbar spine in primates, but lower lumbar spine in humans, quadrupeds and the seal. Sagittal zygapophyseal joint areas resist torsion in the seal and humans. Ventral shear is resisted by frontal zygapophyseal joint areas in humans and primates, and dorsal shear by encompassing joints in the ibex. The human fifth lumbar vertebra is remarkable in possessing the largest endplate surface area and the widest distance between the inferior articular processes, as an indicator of the high degree of axial load and torsion in bipedalism. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11590593     DOI: 10.1002/ar.1156

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anat Rec        ISSN: 0003-276X


  34 in total

1.  Clinical perspectives on secular trends of intervertebral foramen diameters in an industrialized European society.

Authors:  Frank J Rühli; Maciej Henneberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-04-01       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Sagittal endplate morphology of the lower lumbar spine.

Authors:  Palaniappan Lakshmanan; Balaji Purushothaman; Vlasta Dvorak; Walter Schratt; Sathya Thambiraj; Maximilian Boszczyk
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Important macroscopic and microscopic differences in the bony and cartilaginous regions adjacent to the lumbar intervertebral disc between animal and man: a caveat to overinterpretation of animal experiments: comment to the article: Primary stability of anterior lumbar stabilization: interdependence of implant type and endplate retention or removal (C.H. Flamme et al.).

Authors:  M Pfeiffer; D Pfeiffer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparative axial morphology in pinnipeds and its correlation with aquatic locomotory behaviour.

Authors:  S E Pierce; J A Clack; J R Hutchinson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-06-14       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Fast running restricts evolutionary change of the vertebral column in mammals.

Authors:  Frietson Galis; David R Carrier; Joris van Alphen; Steven D van der Mije; Tom J M Van Dooren; Johan A J Metz; Clara M A ten Broek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-14       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  The scaling of postcranial muscles in cats (Felidae) II: hindlimb and lumbosacral muscles.

Authors:  Andrew R Cuff; Emily L Sparkes; Marcela Randau; Stephanie E Pierce; Andrew C Kitchener; Anjali Goswami; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-04-15       Impact factor: 2.610

7.  Thoracic spine morphology of a pseudo-biped animal model (kangaroo) and comparisons with human and quadruped animals.

Authors:  Sriram Balasubramanian; James R Peters; Lucy F Robinson; Anita Singh; Richard W Kent
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparison of animal discs used in disc research to human lumbar disc: torsion mechanics and collagen content.

Authors:  Brent L Showalter; Jesse C Beckstein; John T Martin; Elizabeth E Beattie; Alejandro A Espinoza Orías; Thomas P Schaer; Edward J Vresilovic; Dawn M Elliott
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 9.  Review of nonprimate, large animal models for osteoporosis research.

Authors:  Susan Reinwald; David Burr
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 6.741

Review 10.  Are animal models useful for studying human disc disorders/degeneration?

Authors:  Mauro Alini; Stephen M Eisenstein; Keita Ito; Christopher Little; A Annette Kettler; Koichi Masuda; James Melrose; Jim Ralphs; Ian Stokes; Hans Joachim Wilke
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.