Literature DB >> 27080703

The scaling of postcranial muscles in cats (Felidae) II: hindlimb and lumbosacral muscles.

Andrew R Cuff1,2, Emily L Sparkes2, Marcela Randau1, Stephanie E Pierce2,3, Andrew C Kitchener4,5, Anjali Goswami1, John R Hutchinson1,2.   

Abstract

In quadrupeds the musculature of the hindlimbs is expected to be responsible for generating most of the propulsive locomotory forces, as well as contributing to body support by generating vertical forces. In supporting the body, postural changes from crouched to upright limbs are often associated with an increase of body mass in terrestrial tetrapods. However, felids do not change their crouched limb posture despite undergoing a 300-fold size increase between the smallest and largest extant species. Here, we test how changes in the muscle architecture (masses and lengths of components of the muscle-tendon units) of the hindlimbs and lumbosacral region are related to body mass, to assess whether there are muscular compensations for the maintenance of a crouched limb posture at larger body sizes. We use regression and principal component analyses to detect allometries in muscle architecture, with and without phylogenetic correction. Of the muscle lengths that scale allometrically, all scale with negative allometry (i.e. relative shortening with increasing body mass), whereas all tendon lengths scale isometrically. Only two muscles' belly masses and two tendons' masses scale with positive allometry (i.e. relatively more massive with increasing body mass). Of the muscles that scale allometrically for physiological cross-sectional area, all scale positively (i.e. relatively greater area with increasing body mass). These muscles are mostly linked to control of hip and thigh movements. When the architecture data are phylogenetically corrected, there are few significant results, and only the strongest signals remain. None of the vertebral muscles scaled significantly differently from isometry. Principal component analysis and manovas showed that neither body size nor locomotor mode separate the felid species in morphospace. Our results support the inference that, despite some positively allometric trends in muscle areas related to thigh movement, larger cats have relatively weaker hindlimb and lumbosacral muscles in general. This decrease in power may be reflected in relative decreases in running speeds and is consistent with prevailing evidence that behavioural changes may be the primary mode of compensation for a consistently crouched limb posture in larger cats.
© 2016 Anatomical Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  anatomy; biomechanics; effective mechanical advantage; locomotion; mammal; morphometrics

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27080703      PMCID: PMC5341591          DOI: 10.1111/joa.12474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anat        ISSN: 0021-8782            Impact factor:   2.610


  29 in total

1.  Functional specialisation of pelvic limb anatomy in horses (Equus caballus).

Authors:  R C Payne; J R Hutchinson; J J Robilliard; N C Smith; A M Wilson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Forelimb indicators of prey-size preference in the Felidae.

Authors:  Julie Meachen-Samuels; Blaire Van Valkenburgh
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.804

3.  Bite of the cats: relationships between functional integration and mechanical performance as revealed by mandible geometry.

Authors:  Paolo Piras; Leonardo Maiorino; Luciano Teresi; Carlo Meloro; Federico Lucci; Tassos Kotsakis; Pasquale Raia
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 15.683

4.  Biomechanics: no force limit on greyhound sprint speed.

Authors:  James R Usherwood; Alan M Wilson
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2005-12-08       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Scaling body support in mammals: limb posture and muscle mechanics.

Authors:  A A Biewener
Journal:  Science       Date:  1989-07-07       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Biomechanics of mammalian terrestrial locomotion.

Authors:  A A Biewener
Journal:  Science       Date:  1990-11-23       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Interspecific scaling of the morphology and posture of the limbs during the locomotion of cats (Felidae).

Authors:  Lisa M Day; Bruce C Jayne
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Functional anatomy of the cheetah (Acinonyx jubatus) forelimb.

Authors:  Penny E Hudson; Sandra A Corr; Rachel C Payne-Davis; Sinead N Clancy; Emily Lane; Alan M Wilson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2011-02-21       Impact factor: 2.610

9.  Relationship between body mass and biomechanical properties of limb tendons in adult mammals.

Authors:  C M Pollock; R E Shadwick
Journal:  Am J Physiol       Date:  1994-03

10.  Three-dimensional geometric analysis of felid limb bone allometry.

Authors:  Michael Doube; Alexis Wiktorowicz-Conroy; Alexis Wiktorowicz Conroy; Per Christiansen; John R Hutchinson; Sandra Shefelbine
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  The scaling of postcranial muscles in cats (Felidae) I: forelimb, cervical, and thoracic muscles.

Authors:  Andrew R Cuff; Emily L Sparkes; Marcela Randau; Stephanie E Pierce; Andrew C Kitchener; Anjali Goswami; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2016-04-14       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Mechanics of evolutionary digit reduction in fossil horses (Equidae).

Authors:  Brianna K McHorse; Andrew A Biewener; Stephanie E Pierce
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Ontogenetic allometry and architectural properties of the paravertebral and hindlimb musculature in Eastern cottontail rabbits (Sylvilagus floridanus): functional implications for developmental changes in locomotor performance.

Authors:  M T Butcher; J A Rose; Z D Glenn; N M Tatomirovich; G A Russo; A D Foster; G A Smith; J W Young
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Biomechanics of predator-prey arms race in lion, zebra, cheetah and impala.

Authors:  Alan M Wilson; Tatjana Y Hubel; Simon D Wilshin; John C Lowe; Maja Lorenc; Oliver P Dewhirst; Hattie L A Bartlam-Brooks; Rebecca Diack; Emily Bennitt; Krystyna A Golabek; Roger C Woledge; J Weldon McNutt; Nancy A Curtin; Timothy G West
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 49.962

5.  Where Have All the Giants Gone? How Animals Deal with the Problem of Size.

Authors:  Taylor J M Dick; Christofer J Clemente
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2017-01-11       Impact factor: 8.029

6.  Comparative limb proportions reveal differential locomotor morphofunctions of alligatoroids and crocodyloids.

Authors:  Masaya Iijima; Tai Kubo; Yoshitsugu Kobayashi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-03-07       Impact factor: 2.963

7.  Whole-limb scaling of muscle mass and force-generating capacity in amniotes.

Authors:  Peter J Bishop; Mark A Wright; Stephanie E Pierce
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 8.  From fibre to function: are we accurately representing muscle architecture and performance?

Authors:  James Charles; Roger Kissane; Tatjana Hoehfurtner; Karl T Bates
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2022-04-07

9.  Shape Covariation (or the Lack Thereof) Between Vertebrae and Other Skeletal Traits in Felids: The Whole is Not Always Greater than the Sum of Parts.

Authors:  Marcela Randau; Anjali Goswami
Journal:  Evol Biol       Date:  2018-01-10       Impact factor: 3.119

10.  Adaptation and constraint in the evolution of the mammalian backbone.

Authors:  Katrina E Jones; Lorena Benitez; Kenneth D Angielczyk; Stephanie E Pierce
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.260

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.