Literature DB >> 11586738

The dose-area product and assessment of the occupational dose in interventional radiology.

A Servomaa1, J Karppinen.   

Abstract

This study used dose-area product (DAP) data to determine the relationship between the dose received by radiologists and the DAP. The working conditions were simulated by phantom measurements. The doses of scattered radiation were measured using various scattering angles, distances and tube voltages. The calculated doses of scattered radiation were compared with the measured doses of scattered radiation. To test the validity of using such data for assessing occupational doses, the scatter dose on the radiologist or cardiologist was calculated from the DAP using the measured scatter factors. The dose to the lenses of the eyes may exceed the annual limit, and may therefore restrict the number of interventional procedures. A relation between the DAP and the occupational dose is difficult to establish, especially because staff doses are associated with the use of protective devices, positions of projections with respect to the patient, and working methods. However, the DAP may provide a good reference value for the dosimetric monitoring of staff.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11586738     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.rpd.a006590

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry        ISSN: 0144-8420            Impact factor:   0.972


  10 in total

1.  Occupational radiation doses to the extremities and the eyes in interventional radiology and cardiology procedures.

Authors:  E P Efstathopoulos; I Pantos; M Andreou; A Gkatzis; E Carinou; C Koukorava; N L Kelekis; E Brountzos
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Radiation exposure of the interventional radiologist during percutaneous biopsy using a multiaxis interventional C-arm CT system with 3D laser guidance: a phantom study.

Authors:  Nils Rathmann; Michael Kostrzewa; Kerim Kara; Soenke Bartling; Holger Haubenreisser; Stefan O Schoenberg; Steffen J Diehl
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-15       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Radiation exposure to the primary operator during endovascular surgical neuroradiology procedures.

Authors:  K F Layton; D F Kallmes; H J Cloft; B A Schueler; G M Sturchio
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Radiation exposure of medical staff from interventional x-ray procedures: a multicentre study.

Authors:  Uwe Häusler; Renate Czarwinski; Gunnar Brix
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Comparison of fluoroscopic operator eye exposures when working from femoral region, side, or head of patient.

Authors:  M Jordan Ray; Fawzi Mohammad; William B Taylor; Marco Cura; Clare Savage
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2013-07

6.  Efficacy of a radiation safety education initiative in reducing radiation exposure in the pediatric IR suite.

Authors:  David D Sheyn; John M Racadio; Jun Ying; Manish N Patel; Judy M Racadio; Neil D Johnson
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2008-04-15

7.  Organ-specific external dose coefficients and protective apron transmission factors for historical dose reconstruction for medical personnel.

Authors:  Steven L Simon
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 2.922

8.  Direct Effective Dose Calculations in Pediatric Fluoroscopy-Guided Abdominal Interventions with Rando-Alderson Phantoms - Optimization of Preset Parameter Settings.

Authors:  Moritz Wildgruber; René Müller-Wille; Holger Goessmann; Wibke Uller; Walter A Wohlgemuth
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The radiation environment of anaesthesiologists in the endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography room.

Authors:  Bora Lee; Min-Soo Kim; Darhae Eum; Kyeong Tae Min
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Physical analysis of the shielding capacity for a lightweight apron designed for shielding low intensity scattering X-rays.

Authors:  Seon Chil Kim; Jeong Ryeol Choi; Byeong Kyou Jeon
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.