Literature DB >> 11584484

Failed vacuum extraction. Maternal risk factors and pregnancy outcome.

E Sheiner1, I Shoham-Vardi, T Silberstein, M Hallak, M Katz, M Mazor.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate obstetric risk factors associated with a failed trial of vacuum extraction and to assess its pregnancy outcome. STUDY
DESIGN: All attempted vacuum extractions between the years 1990 and 1998 were identified, and a comparison of successful and failed trials of vacuum extraction in singleton, vertex deliveries was performed.
RESULTS: Of 2,111 trials of vacuum extraction, 113 (5.4%) cases were complicated by failed extraction and underwent cesarean section. Those neonates were significantly more likely to be large for gestational age, specifically to weigh > 4,000 g as compared to the controls. Patients lacking prenatal care had significantly higher rates of failed vacuum extraction trials. While cervical and uterine tears were rather rare, parturients who had failed trials of vacuum extraction had significantly higher rates of cervical and uterine tears as compared to those with successful vacuum extractions. This association remained significant after controlling for a previous cesarean section using the Mantel-Hanszel technique. Women from the failed vacuum extraction group had significantly higher rates of postpartum anemia. Pregnancies complicated by failed vacuum extraction had significantly higher rates of intrapartum and postpartum fetal death. Those neonates had significantly higher rates of Apgar scores < 7 at one and five minutes.
CONCLUSION: Failed trial of vacuum extraction is associated with adverse maternal and fetal outcomes. Risk factors associated with such failures are fetal weight and lack of prenatal care. Thus, careful estimation of fetal weight should be performed before the procedure, and estimated fetal weight > 4,000 g might be considered a relative contraindication to vacuum extraction, especially among patients who did not have prenatal care.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11584484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Reprod Med        ISSN: 0024-7758            Impact factor:   0.142


  8 in total

1.  Factors influencing the likelihood of instrumental delivery success.

Authors:  Catherine E Aiken; Abigail R Aiken; Jeremy C Brockelsby; James G Scott
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 7.661

2.  Time to delivery based on sonographic assessment prior to forceps and vacuum.

Authors:  Sana Usman; Birgitte Kahrs; Helen Barton; Kjell Salvesen; Torbjorn Moe Eggebo; Christoph Lees
Journal:  Australas J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2019-01-21

3.  Can pelvic floor dysfunction after vaginal birth be prevented?

Authors:  Denise Howard; Michel Makhlouf
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-08-15       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Trial of instrumental delivery in theatre versus immediate caesarean section for anticipated difficult assisted births.

Authors:  Franz Majoko; Glenn Gardener
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

5.  Attempted and Successful Vacuum-Assisted Vaginal Delivery by Prepregnancy Body Mass Index.

Authors:  Sebastian Z Ramos; Molly E Waring; Katherine Leung; Nili S Amir; Annika L Bannon; Tiffany A Moore Simas
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 7.623

6.  Cross sectional study in China: fetal gender has adverse perinatal outcomes in mainland China.

Authors:  Lei Hou; Xin Wang; Guanghui Li; Liying Zou; Yi Chen; Weiyuan Zhang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2014-10-26       Impact factor: 3.007

7.  Differences in pregnancy complications and outcomes by fetal gender among Japanese women: a multicenter cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Satoru Funaki; Kohei Ogawa; Nobuaki Ozawa; Aikou Okamoto; Naho Morisaki; Haruhiko Sago
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Neonatal outcomes in relation to sex differences: a national cohort survey in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yi-Hao Weng; Chun-Yuh Yang; Ya-Wen Chiu
Journal:  Biol Sex Differ       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 5.027

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.