Literature DB >> 28079766

Attempted and Successful Vacuum-Assisted Vaginal Delivery by Prepregnancy Body Mass Index.

Sebastian Z Ramos1, Molly E Waring, Katherine Leung, Nili S Amir, Annika L Bannon, Tiffany A Moore Simas.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine rates of attempted and successful vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery by prepregnancy body mass index (BMI).
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 2,084 women with singleton gestations needing operative delivery assistance and vacuum-eligible (fully dilated, +2 station or greater, 34 weeks of gestation or greater) using 2006-2014 inpatient records. Prepregnancy BMI was categorized as underweight (less than 18.5), normal weight (18.5 to less than 25), overweight (25 to less than 30), or obese (30 or greater). Logistic regression models estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of attempted and successful vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery by prepregnancy BMI adjusted for age, race, marital status, parity, diabetes, labor induction-augmentation, episiotomy, gestational age, and neonatal birth weight.
RESULTS: Thirty-nine percent of women requiring delivery assistance and eligible for a vacuum were overweight or obese, 79% had vacuum attempts, and 95.3% of attempted vacuum-assisted vaginal deliveries were successful. Compared with women who were normal weight prepregnancy (82.8%), women who were overweight or obese were less likely to have vacuum attempted (75.8%, OR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53-0.96 and 71.2%, OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.39-0.74, respectively). Among women with attempted vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery, successful delivery did not differ by prepregnancy BMI (92.6%, OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.21-1.37 for underweight; 94.5%, OR 1.07, 95% CI 0.57-2.00 for overweight; 96.3%, OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.51-2.33 for obese compared with 95.6% among normal-weight women).
CONCLUSION: Among women in need of operative delivery assistance, prepregnancy obesity was associated with lower likelihood of attempted vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery but, if attempted, success rates were similar to rates among normal-weight women. With significant morbidity of second-stage cesarean delivery in obese women, research should examine whether vacuum-assisted vaginal delivery may be appropriate for additional obese patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28079766      PMCID: PMC5325709          DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.623


  28 in total

1.  Impact of updated Institute of Medicine guidelines on prepregnancy body mass index categorization, gestational weight gain recommendations, and needed counseling.

Authors:  Tiffany A Moore Simas; Xun Liao; Anne Garrison; Gina M T Sullivan; Allison E Howard; Janet R Hardy
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2011-04-21       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  Pre-pregnant body mass index, gestational weight gain and the risk of operative delivery.

Authors:  Nils-Halvdan Morken; Kari Klungsøyr; Per Magnus; Rolv Skjærven
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2013-03-19       Impact factor: 3.636

3.  Severe perineal lacerations during vaginal delivery: the University of Miami experience.

Authors:  R Angioli; O Gómez-Marín; G Cantuaria; M J O'sullivan
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 8.661

4.  Prevalence of childhood and adult obesity in the United States, 2011-2012.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Brian K Kit; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Obesity, obstetric complications and cesarean delivery rate--a population-based screening study.

Authors:  Joshua L Weiss; Fergal D Malone; Danielle Emig; Robert H Ball; David A Nyberg; Christine H Comstock; George Saade; Keith Eddleman; Suzanne M Carter; Sabrina D Craigo; Stephen R Carr; Mary E D'Alton
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Intrauterine pressure during the second stage of labor in obese women.

Authors:  Catalin S Buhimschi; Irina A Buhimschi; Andrew M Malinow; Carl P Weiner
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Is maternal obesity a predictor of shoulder dystocia?

Authors:  H Robinson; S Tkatch; Damon C Mayes; Nancy Bott; N Okun
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  The association of maternal weight with cesarean risk, labor duration, and cervical dilation rate during labor induction.

Authors:  Francis S Nuthalapaty; Dwight J Rouse; John Owen
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Extreme obesity and postcesarean maternal complications.

Authors:  David M Stamilio; Christina M Scifres
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  ACOG Committee opinion no. 549: obesity in pregnancy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 7.661

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Overweight, obesity and excessive weight gain in pregnancy as risk factors for adverse pregnancy outcomes: A narrative review.

Authors:  Simon C Langley-Evans; Jo Pearce; Sarah Ellis
Journal:  J Hum Nutr Diet       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 2.995

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.