Literature DB >> 11580187

How accurate is a CT-based dose calculation on a pencil beam TPS for a patient with a metallic prosthesis?

R Roberts1.   

Abstract

The accuracy of a CT-based dose calculation on a treatment planning system (TPS) for a radiotherapy patient with a metallic prosthesis has not previously been reported. In this study, the accuracy of the CT-based inhomogeneity correction on a pencil beam TPS (Helax TMS) was determined in a phantom containing a metallic prosthesis. A steel prosthesis phantom and a titanium prosthesis phantom were investigated. The phantoms were CT-scanned and dose plans produced on the TPS, using the CT images to provide density information for the inhomogeneity corrections. Verification measurements were performed on a linear accelerator for 6 and 15 MV x-rays. Measured dose profiles at three different depths were compared to the calculations of the TPS. For the titanium prosthesis and for 6 MV x-rays, the TPS overestimated the beam attenuation by approximately 20% at 15 and 20 cm depths in the phantom. This is due to a limitation in the density allocation of this TPS: any Hounsfield number (HN) above a certain threshold is allocated the density of steel. For the steel prosthesis, the TPS performed the correct mapping of HN to mass density. The dose calculation was within 6% for 6 MV x-rays at 15 and 20 cm depths. However. the accuracy of dose calculation varied with beam energy and depth, with large errors in the region close to the prosthesis. The TPS overestimated the dose by 11% for 6 MV and 15% for 15 MV x-rays at 11 cm depth. 2.5 cm beyond the steel prosthesis. These results highlight the limitations in the density allocation of this TPS and demonstrate shortcomings in the pencil beam dose calculation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11580187     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/46/9/402

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  8 in total

1.  Dose attenuation effect of hip prostheses in a 9-MV photon beam: commercial treatment planning system versus Monte Carlo calculations.

Authors:  Asghar Mesbahi; Farshad Seyed Nejad
Journal:  Radiat Med       Date:  2007-12-25

2.  Influence of metallic dental implants and metal artefacts on dose calculation accuracy.

Authors:  Manuel Maerz; Oliver Koelbl; Barbara Dobler
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.621

3.  The accuracy of treatment planning system dose modelling in the presence of brass mesh bolus.

Authors:  Neil Richmond
Journal:  Rep Pract Oncol Radiother       Date:  2017-07-22

4.  Development of patient-specific phantoms for verification of stereotactic body radiation therapy planning in patients with metallic screw fixation.

Authors:  Dongryul Oh; Chae-Seon Hong; Sang Gyu Ju; Minkyu Kim; Bum Yong Koo; SungBack Choi; Hee Chul Park; Doo Ho Choi; Hongryull Pyo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Improvement of dose calculation in radiation therapy due to metal artifact correction using the augmented likelihood image reconstruction.

Authors:  Christian Ziemann; Maik Stille; Florian Cremers; Thorsten M Buzug; Dirk Rades
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 2.102

6.  Evaluation of dose calculation accuracy of treatment planning systems at hip prosthesis interfaces.

Authors:  David Paulu; Parham Alaei
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-03-20       Impact factor: 2.102

7.  Dose uncertainties associated with a set density override of unknown hip prosthetic composition.

Authors:  James D Rijken; Christopher J Colyer
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 2.102

8.  Influence of internal fixation systems on radiation therapy for spinal tumor.

Authors:  Jingfeng Li; Lei Yan; Jianping Wang; Lin Cai; Dongcai Hu
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 2.102

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.