PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to develop a short and a screening version of the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) that would be suitable across diagnostic groups of cognitively impaired older adults, and that could be used for cross-sectional, longitudinal, and intervention studies. DESIGN AND METHODS: We used data from 413 caregivers of cognitively impaired older adults referred to a memory clinic. We collected information on caregiver burden with the 22-item ZBI, and information about dependence in activities of daily living (ADLs) and the frequency of problem behaviors among care recipients. We used factor analysis and item-total correlations to reduce the number of items while taking into consideration diagnosis and change scores. RESULTS: We produced a 12-item version (short) and a 4-item version (screening) of the ZBI. Correlations between the short and the full version ranged from 0.92 to 0.97, and from 0.83 to 0.93 for the screening version. Correlations between the three versions and ADL and problem behaviors were similar. We further investigated the behavior of the short version with a two-way analysis of variance and found that it produced identical results to the full version. IMPLICATIONS: The short and screening versions of the ZBI produced results comparable to those of the full version. Reducing the number of items did not affect the properties of the ZBI, and it may lead to easier administration of the instrument.
PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to develop a short and a screening version of the Zarit Burden Interview (ZBI) that would be suitable across diagnostic groups of cognitively impaired older adults, and that could be used for cross-sectional, longitudinal, and intervention studies. DESIGN AND METHODS: We used data from 413 caregivers of cognitively impaired older adults referred to a memory clinic. We collected information on caregiver burden with the 22-item ZBI, and information about dependence in activities of daily living (ADLs) and the frequency of problem behaviors among care recipients. We used factor analysis and item-total correlations to reduce the number of items while taking into consideration diagnosis and change scores. RESULTS: We produced a 12-item version (short) and a 4-item version (screening) of the ZBI. Correlations between the short and the full version ranged from 0.92 to 0.97, and from 0.83 to 0.93 for the screening version. Correlations between the three versions and ADL and problem behaviors were similar. We further investigated the behavior of the short version with a two-way analysis of variance and found that it produced identical results to the full version. IMPLICATIONS: The short and screening versions of the ZBI produced results comparable to those of the full version. Reducing the number of items did not affect the properties of the ZBI, and it may lead to easier administration of the instrument.
Authors: Yael Schenker; Nathan Bahary; Rene Claxton; Julie Childers; Edward Chu; Dio Kavalieratos; Linda King; Barry Lembersky; Greer Tiver; Robert M Arnold Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2017-08-03 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Linda Boise; Elizabeth Eckstrom; Lyle Fagnan; Anne King; Monica Goubaud; David I Buckley; Cynthia Morris Journal: J Am Board Fam Med Date: 2010 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 2.657
Authors: Alycia A Bristol; Kimberly A Convery; Victor Sotelo; Catherine E Schneider; Shih-Yin Lin; Jason Fletcher; Randall Rupper; James E Galvin; Abraham A Brody Journal: Contemp Clin Trials Date: 2020-04-19 Impact factor: 2.226
Authors: Steven H Belle; Louis Burgio; Robert Burns; David Coon; Sara J Czaja; Dolores Gallagher-Thompson; Laura N Gitlin; Julie Klinger; Kathy Mann Koepke; Chin Chin Lee; Jennifer Martindale-Adams; Linda Nichols; Richard Schulz; Sidney Stahl; Alan Stevens; Laraine Winter; Song Zhang Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2006-11-21 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Daniel P Sulmasy; Mark T Hughes; Gayane Yenokyan; Joan Kub; Peter B Terry; Alan B Astrow; Julie A Johnson; Grace Ho; Marie T Nolan Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2017-07-14 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: JiYeon Choi; Judith A Tate; Leslie A Hoffman; Richard Schulz; Dianxu Ren; Michael P Donahoe; Barbara A Given; Paula R Sherwood Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2014-01-16 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Oanh L Meyer; Xiaoyan Lucia Liu; Daniel Tancredi; A Susana Ramirez; Richard Schulz; Ladson Hinton Journal: Aging Ment Health Date: 2017-04-24 Impact factor: 3.658
Authors: JiYeon Choi; Judith A Tate; Michael P Donahoe; Dianxu Ren; Leslie A Hoffman; Eileen R Chasens Journal: Intensive Crit Care Nurs Date: 2016-08-27 Impact factor: 3.072