INTRODUCTION: The aim of the Rural Older Adult Memory (ROAM) pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of screening and diagnosing dementia in patients aged 75 years or older in 6 rural primary care practices in a practice-based research network. METHODS: Clinicians and medical assistants were trained in dementia screening using the ROAM protocol via distance learning methods. Medical assistants screened patients aged 75 years of age and older. For patients who screened positive, the clinician was alerted to the need for a dementia work-up. Outcomes included change in the proportion of patients who were screened and diagnosed with dementia or mild cognitive impairment, clinician confidence in diagnosing and managing dementia, and response to the intervention. RESULTS: Results included a substantial increase in screening for dementia, a modest increase in the proportion of patients who were diagnosed with dementia or mild cognitive impairment, and improved clinician confidence in diagnosing dementia. Although clinicians and medical assistants found the ROAM protocol easy to implement, there was substantial variability in adherence to the protocol among the 6 practices. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the complex issues that must be addressed in implementing a dementia screening process in rural primary care. Further study is needed to develop effective strategies for overcoming the factors that impeded the full uptake of the protocol, including the logistic challenges in implementing practice change and clinicians' attitudes toward dementia screening and diagnosis.
INTRODUCTION: The aim of the Rural Older Adult Memory (ROAM) pilot study was to evaluate the feasibility of screening and diagnosing dementia in patients aged 75 years or older in 6 rural primary care practices in a practice-based research network. METHODS: Clinicians and medical assistants were trained in dementia screening using the ROAM protocol via distance learning methods. Medical assistants screened patients aged 75 years of age and older. For patients who screened positive, the clinician was alerted to the need for a dementia work-up. Outcomes included change in the proportion of patients who were screened and diagnosed with dementia or mild cognitive impairment, clinician confidence in diagnosing and managing dementia, and response to the intervention. RESULTS: Results included a substantial increase in screening for dementia, a modest increase in the proportion of patients who were diagnosed with dementia or mild cognitive impairment, and improved clinician confidence in diagnosing dementia. Although clinicians and medical assistants found the ROAM protocol easy to implement, there was substantial variability in adherence to the protocol among the 6 practices. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the complex issues that must be addressed in implementing a dementia screening process in rural primary care. Further study is needed to develop effective strategies for overcoming the factors that impeded the full uptake of the protocol, including the logistic challenges in implementing practice change and clinicians' attitudes toward dementia screening and diagnosis.
Authors: William M Tierney; Caitlin C Oppenheimer; Brenda L Hudson; Jennifer Benz; Amy Finn; John M Hickner; David Lanier; Daniel S Gaylin Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2007 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Paul A Nutting; William L Miller; Benjamin F Crabtree; Carlos Roberto Jaen; Elizabeth E Stewart; Kurt C Stange Journal: Ann Fam Med Date: 2009 May-Jun Impact factor: 5.166
Authors: Deborah J Cohen; Benjamin F Crabtree; Rebecca S Etz; Bijal A Balasubramanian; Katrina E Donahue; Laura C Leviton; Elizabeth C Clark; Nicole F Isaacson; Kurt C Stange; Lawrence W Green Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2008-11 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Howard H Feldman; Claudia Jacova; Alain Robillard; Angeles Garcia; Tiffany Chow; Michael Borrie; Hyman M Schipper; Mervin Blair; Andrew Kertesz; Howard Chertkow Journal: CMAJ Date: 2008-03-25 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: B L Plassman; K M Langa; G G Fisher; S G Heeringa; D R Weir; M B Ofstedal; J R Burke; M D Hurd; G G Potter; W L Rodgers; D C Steffens; R J Willis; R B Wallace Journal: Neuroepidemiology Date: 2007-10-29 Impact factor: 3.282
Authors: Soo Borson; James Scanlan; Jeffrey Hummel; Kathy Gibbs; Mary Lessig; Elizabeth Zuhr Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2007-04-20 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Nicole R Fowler; Malaz A Boustani; Amie Frame; Anthony J Perkins; Patrick Monahan; Sujuan Gao; Greg A Sachs; Hugh C Hendrie Journal: J Am Geriatr Soc Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 5.562
Authors: Amanda Harrawood; Nicole R Fowler; Anthony J Perkins; Michael A LaMantia; Malaz A Boustani Journal: Curr Alzheimer Res Date: 2018 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Steven Martin; Sarah Kelly; Ayesha Khan; Sarah Cullum; Tom Dening; Greta Rait; Chris Fox; Cornelius Katona; Theodore Cosco; Carol Brayne; Louise Lafortune Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2015-06-16 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Nicole R Fowler; Amie Frame; Anthony J Perkins; Sujuan Gao; Dennis P Watson; Patrick Monahan; Malaz A Boustani Journal: Alzheimers Dement (Amst) Date: 2015-06