Literature DB >> 11573049

Effect of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on perioperative outcome: a randomized, controlled Veterans Affairs cooperative study.

W Y Park1, J S Thompson, K K Lee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that epidural anesthesia and postoperative epidural analgesia decrease the incidence of death and major complications during and after four types of intraabdominal surgical procedures. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Even though many beneficial aspects of epidural anesthesia have been reported, clinical trials of epidural anesthesia for outcome of surgical patients have shown conflicting results.
METHODS: The authors studied 1,021 patients who required anesthesia for one of the intraabdominal aortic, gastric, biliary, or colon operations. They were assigned randomly to receive either general anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with parenteral opioids (group 1) or epidural plus light general anesthesia and postoperative epidural morphine (group 2). The patients were monitored for death and major complications during and for 30 days after surgery, as well as for postoperative pain, time of ambulation, and length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: Overall, there was no significant difference in the incidence of death and major complications between the two groups. For abdominal aortic surgical patients, unlike the other three types of surgical patients, the overall incidence of death and major complications was significantly lower in group 2 patients (22%) than in group 1 patients (37%), stemming from differences in the incidence of new myocardial infarction, stroke, and respiratory failure between the two groups. Overall, group 2 patients received significantly less analgesic medication but had better pain relief than group 1 patients. In group 2 aortic patients, endotracheal intubation time was 13 hours shorter and surgical intensive care stay was 3.5 hours shorter.
CONCLUSIONS: The effect of anesthetic and postoperative analgesic techniques on perioperative outcome varies with the type of operation performed. Overall, epidural analgesia provides better postoperative pain relief. Epidural anesthesia and epidural analgesia improve the overall outcome and shorten the intubation time and intensive care stay in patients undergoing abdominal aortic operations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11573049      PMCID: PMC1422079          DOI: 10.1097/00000658-200110000-00015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  19 in total

Review 1.  Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials.

Authors:  A Rodgers; N Walker; S Schug; A McKee; H Kehlet; A van Zundert; D Sage; M Futter; G Saville; T Clark; S MacMahon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-16

2.  Combined epidural and general anesthesia versus general anesthesia for abdominal aortic surgery.

Authors:  J F Baron; M Bertrand; E Barré; G Godet; O Mundler; P Coriat; P Viars
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 7.892

3.  Epidural versus general anesthesia for infrainguinal arterial reconstruction.

Authors:  S P Rivers; L A Scher; E Sheehan; F J Veith
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Improvement in blood flow during lower extremity microsurgical free tissue transfer associated with epidural anesthesia.

Authors:  S Weber; C R Bennett; N F Jones
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 5.108

Review 5.  Epidural anesthesia and analgesia. Their role in postoperative outcome.

Authors:  S Liu; R L Carpenter; J M Neal
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 6.  Pain control after thoracic surgery. A review of current techniques.

Authors:  B P Kavanagh; J Katz; A N Sandler
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 7.892

7.  Intra- and post-operative blood loss and haemodynamics in total hip replacement when performed under lumbar epidural versus general anaesthesia.

Authors:  J Modig; G Karlström
Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 4.330

8.  Effects of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on coagulation and outcome after major vascular surgery.

Authors:  K J Tuman; R J McCarthy; R J March; G A DeLaria; R V Patel; A D Ivankovich
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 5.108

9.  Perioperative morbidity in patients randomized to epidural or general anesthesia for lower extremity vascular surgery. Perioperative Ischemia Randomized Anesthesia Trial Study Group.

Authors:  R Christopherson; C Beattie; S M Frank; E J Norris; C L Meinert; S O Gottlieb; H Yates; P Rock; S D Parker; B A Perler
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  Cardiac outcome after peripheral vascular surgery. Comparison of general and regional anesthesia.

Authors:  R H Bode; K P Lewis; S W Zarich; E T Pierce; M Roberts; G J Kowalchuk; P R Satwicz; G W Gibbons; J A Hunter; C C Espanola
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 7.892

View more
  68 in total

Review 1.  The role of epidural anesthesia and analgesia in surgical practice.

Authors:  Robert J Moraca; David G Sheldon; Richard C Thirlby
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  [Survey on current practice of regional anaesthesia in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Part 2: Use, success rates and techniques].

Authors:  T Grau; S Fatehi; J Motsch; E Bartusseck
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 3.  Effect of postoperative pain treatment on outcome-current status and future strategies.

Authors:  Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-02-28       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Understanding outcomes after neuraxial anaesthesia: time to turn the page.

Authors:  M D Neuman
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2015-10-20       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 5.  [Strategies for perioperative sympatho-modulation].

Authors:  J Wacker; T Pasch; M C Schaub; M Zaugg
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 1.041

6.  Safety, feasibility, and tolerance of early oral feeding after colorectal resection outside an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program.

Authors:  Luca Gianotti; Luca Nespoli; Laura Torselli; Mariarita Panelli; Angelo Nespoli
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Perioperative fluid retention and clinical outcome in elective, high-risk colorectal surgery.

Authors:  Axel Kleespies; Manfred Thiel; Karl-Walter Jauch; Wolfgang H Hartl
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-02-17       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 8.  The benefits of adding epidural analgesia to general anesthesia: a metaanalysis.

Authors:  Joanne Guay
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 9.  Preoperative cardiac risk assessment for noncardiac surgery in patients with heart failure.

Authors:  Jenica Upshaw; Michael S Kiernan
Journal:  Curr Heart Fail Rep       Date:  2013-06

Review 10.  Neuraxial blockade for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Peter Choi; Santhanam Suresh; Natalie Albert; Sandra Kopp; Nathan Leon Pace
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-01-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.