Literature DB >> 3322824

Intra- and post-operative blood loss and haemodynamics in total hip replacement when performed under lumbar epidural versus general anaesthesia.

J Modig1, G Karlström.   

Abstract

The effects of lumbar epidural anaesthesia and two types of general anaesthesia on blood loss and haemodynamics during and after hip replacement were compared in three groups of patients. One group (n = 14) received continuous lumbar epidural anaesthesia, another group (n = 10) was given inhalational anaesthesia and spontaneous breathing after endotracheal intubation, and the third group (n = 14) received artificial ventilation after intubation and pancuronium and fentanyl intermittently i.v. Intra-operative blood loss in patients under epidural anaesthesia was 950 +/- 300 ml (mean +/- SD) and blood loss during the following 24 h-i.e. as long as the epidural anaesthesia was maintained-was 370 +/- 80 ml. These figures were significantly lower than the intra- and post-operative blood losses in patients under general anaesthesia with narcotics as post-operative pain treatment: 1140 +/- 200 ml (inhalational anaesthesia) followed by 480 +/- 70 ml and 1540 +/- 340 ml (artificial ventilation) followed by 500 +/- 110 ml. The intra-operative blood loss in the general anaesthesia group with spontaneous breathing was significantly smaller than the blood loss in the artificially ventilated group, whereas the post-operative blood loss in the two general anaesthetic groups was similar. Haemodynamic differences explain these differences in blood loss. Thus epidural anaesthesia induced hypotension on the arterial and venous sides. Intra-operatively, inhalational anaesthesia also induced hypotension on the arterial and venous sides compared with general anaesthesia using artificial ventilation. Post-operatively, the general anaesthesia groups behaved haemodynamically similarly and no differences in blood loss were seen. The reduction in blood loss, notably associated with lumbar epidural anaesthesia, is beneficial in decreasing the hazard and cost of blood transfusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3322824

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Anaesthesiol        ISSN: 0265-0215            Impact factor:   4.330


  13 in total

Review 1.  Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials.

Authors:  A Rodgers; N Walker; S Schug; A McKee; H Kehlet; A van Zundert; D Sage; M Futter; G Saville; T Clark; S MacMahon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-16

2.  General compared with spinal anesthesia for total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Bryce A Basques; Jason O Toy; Daniel D Bohl; Nicholas S Golinvaux; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 5.284

3.  Effect of epidural anesthesia and analgesia on perioperative outcome: a randomized, controlled Veterans Affairs cooperative study.

Authors:  W Y Park; J S Thompson; K K Lee
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  The effect of spinal anesthesia on blood transfusion rate in total joint arthroplasty.

Authors:  Saifudin Rashiq; Barry A Finegan
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Peripheral nerve block use in ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: utilization patterns and impact on outcomes.

Authors:  Jimmy J Chan; Evan Garden; Jesse C Chan; Jashvant Poeran; Nicole Zubizarreta; Madhu Mazumdar; Leesa M Galatz; Ettore Vulcano
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2021-09-04       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 6.  Blood loss in total hip replacement. A retrospective study.

Authors:  P A Flordal; G Neander
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 3.067

7.  Lumbar spine instrumented fusion surgery under spinal anaesthesia versus general anaesthesia-A retrospective study of 239 cases.

Authors:  Saikat Sarkar; Aditi Banerji; Arindam Chattopadhyaya; Sitikantha Banerjee
Journal:  J Clin Orthop Trauma       Date:  2021-05-02

8.  Spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for elective lumbar spine surgery: A randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Attari; Sayyed Ahmad Mirhosseini; Azim Honarmand; Mohammad Reza Safavi
Journal:  J Res Med Sci       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 1.852

9.  Efficiency of spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia for lumbar spinal surgery: a retrospective analysis of 544 patients.

Authors:  John T Pierce; Guy Kositratna; Mark A Attiah; Michael J Kallan; Rebecca Koenigsberg; Peter Syre; David Wyler; Paul J Marcotte; W Andrew Kofke; William C Welch
Journal:  Local Reg Anesth       Date:  2017-10-10

10.  Comparison of Short-Term Complications of General and Spinal Anesthesia for Primary Unilateral Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Yong Bok Park; Won Seok Chae; Sin Hyung Park; Ji Soo Yu; Sun Geun Lee; Soo Jae Yim
Journal:  Knee Surg Relat Res       Date:  2017-06-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.