Literature DB >> 8572352

Cardiac outcome after peripheral vascular surgery. Comparison of general and regional anesthesia.

R H Bode1, K P Lewis, S W Zarich, E T Pierce, M Roberts, G J Kowalchuk, P R Satwicz, G W Gibbons, J A Hunter, C C Espanola.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite evidence that regional anesthesia may be associated with fewer perioperative complications than general anesthesia, most studies that have compared cardiac outcome after general or regional anesthesia alone have not shown major differences. This study examines the impact of anesthetic choice on cardiac outcome in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery who have a high likelihood of associated coronary artery disease.
METHODS: Four hundred twenty-three patients, between 1988 and 1991, were randomly assigned to receive general (n = 138), epidural (n = 149), or spinal anesthesia (n = 136) for femoral to distal artery bypass surgery. All patients were monitored with radial artery and pulmonary artery catheters. Postoperatively, patients were in a monitored setting for 48-72 h and had daily electrocardiograms for 4-5 days and creatine phosphokinase/isoenzymes every 8 h x 3, then daily for 4 days. Cardiac outcomes recorded were myocardial infarction, angina, and congestive heart failure.
RESULTS: Baseline clinical characteristics were not different between anesthetic groups. Overall, the patient population included 86% who were diabetic, 69% with hypertension, 36% with a history of a prior myocardial infarction, and 41% with a history of smoking. Cardiovascular morbidity and overall mortality were not significantly different between groups when analyzed by either intention to treat or type of anesthesia received. In the intention to treat analysis, incidences of cardiac event or death for general, spinal, and epidural groups were 16.7%, 21.3%, and 15.4%, respectively. The absolute risk difference observed between general and all regional anesthesia groups for cardiac event or death was -1.6% (95% confidence interval -9.2%, 6.1%) This reflected a nonsignificant trend for lower risk of postoperative events with general anesthesia.
CONCLUSIONS: The choice of anesthesia, when delivered as described, does not significantly influence cardiac morbidity and overall mortality in patients undergoing peripheral vascular surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8572352     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199601000-00002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  21 in total

Review 1.  Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials.

Authors:  A Rodgers; N Walker; S Schug; A McKee; H Kehlet; A van Zundert; D Sage; M Futter; G Saville; T Clark; S MacMahon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-16

2.  [Survey on current practice of regional anaesthesia in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Part 2: Use, success rates and techniques].

Authors:  T Grau; S Fatehi; J Motsch; E Bartusseck
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.041

3.  Perioperative myocardial infarction in peripheral vascular surgery. Stratifying patients by perioperative risk is equivalent to screening.

Authors:  S Howell; P Foex
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-09-21

Review 4.  Perioperative ischemic stroke in non-cardiovascular surgery patients.

Authors:  Mutsuhito Kikura; Brian T Bateman; Kenichi A Tanaka
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 2.078

5.  [Spermatic cord block and periscrotal block according to Reclus. Alternative procedure for critically ill patients].

Authors:  S T Lorenz; K Renkawitz
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 1.041

Review 6.  Neuraxial blockade for the prevention of postoperative mortality and major morbidity: an overview of Cochrane systematic reviews.

Authors:  Joanne Guay; Peter Choi; Santhanam Suresh; Natalie Albert; Sandra Kopp; Nathan Leon Pace
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2014-01-25

7.  Transversus abdominis plane block for an emergency laparotomy in a high-risk, elderly patient.

Authors:  Surekha S Patil; Shonali C Pawar; Vm Divekar; Rochana G Bakhshi
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-05

Review 8.  Issues in the perioperative management of the elderly patient with cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  John W Sear; Helen Higham
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 3.923

Review 9.  [Intraoperative echocardiography: impact on surgical decision-making].

Authors:  E Schmid; M Nowak; K Unertl; P Rosenberger
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.041

10.  Left ventricular pressure-volume relationship in a rat model of advanced aging-associated heart failure.

Authors:  Pál Pacher; Jon G Mabley; Lucas Liaudet; Oleg V Evgenov; Anita Marton; György Haskó; Márk Kollai; Csaba Szabó
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 4.733

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.