OBJECTIVE: To explore how best to make high-quality preventive health information available to consumers on the Internet. DESIGN: Focus groups. SETTING: Three urban workplaces and one local hospital with patients from a rural family medical practice. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two men and 17 women patients. METHOD: Qualitative survey of four focus groups, analysis of transcripts and researchers' notes. MAIN FINDINGS: Five themes characterized participants' perceptions of a consumer website of evidence-based preventive guidelines: content expectations, website design, trustworthiness of content, marketing, and the implications of consumer health information on the Internet. CONCLUSION: Consumers want preventive health information both for taking care of themselves and for participating in a more informed way in their health care when they see a physician. Findings of this study reveal some ways in which consumers' use of Internet health information can affect physicians' and other health professionals' work.
OBJECTIVE: To explore how best to make high-quality preventive health information available to consumers on the Internet. DESIGN: Focus groups. SETTING: Three urban workplaces and one local hospital with patients from a rural family medical practice. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-two men and 17 womenpatients. METHOD: Qualitative survey of four focus groups, analysis of transcripts and researchers' notes. MAIN FINDINGS: Five themes characterized participants' perceptions of a consumer website of evidence-based preventive guidelines: content expectations, website design, trustworthiness of content, marketing, and the implications of consumer health information on the Internet. CONCLUSION: Consumers want preventive health information both for taking care of themselves and for participating in a more informed way in their health care when they see a physician. Findings of this study reveal some ways in which consumers' use of Internet health information can affect physicians' and other health professionals' work.
Authors: M A Winker; A Flanagin; B Chi-Lum; J White; K Andrews; R L Kennett; C D DeAngelis; R A Musacchio Journal: JAMA Date: 2000 Mar 22-29 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Melissa K Filippi; Christina M Pacheco; Charlotte McCloskey; Rebecca Jeanne Crosthwait; Justin Begaye; Jb Kinlacheeny; Won S Choi; K Allen Greiner; Christine M Daley Journal: J Health Dispar Res Pract Date: 2014
Authors: Amol Utrankar; Tilicia L Mayo-Gamble; Whitney Allen; Laurie Novak; Adetola A Kassim; Kemberlee Bonnet; David Schlundt; Velma M Murry; Gretchen Purcell Jackson; Michael DeBaun; Robert M Cronin Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2018-08-01 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Kirsty Loudon; Nancy Santesso; Margaret Callaghan; Judith Thornton; Jenny Harbour; Karen Graham; Robin Harbour; Ilkka Kunnamo; Helena Liira; Emma McFarlane; Karen Ritchie; Shaun Treweek Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-07-27 Impact factor: 2.655