Literature DB >> 3319971

Focus group interview: an underutilized research technique for improving theory and practice in health education.

C E Basch1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to increase awareness about and stimulate interest in using focus group interviews, a qualitative research technique, to advance the state-of-the-art of education and learning about health. After a brief discussion of small group process in health education, features of focus group interviews are presented, and a theoretical framework for planning a focus group study is summarized. Then, literature describing traditional and health-related applications of focus group interviews is reviewed and a synthesis of methodological limitations and advantages of this technique is presented. Implications are discussed regarding: need for more inductive qualitative research in health education; utility of focus group interviews for research and for formative and summative evaluation of health education programs; applicability of marketing research to understanding and influencing consumer behavior, despite notable distinctions between educational initiatives and marketing; and need for professional preparation faculty to consider increasing emphasis on qualitative research methods.

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3319971     DOI: 10.1177/109019818701400404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Educ Q        ISSN: 0195-8402


  86 in total

1.  Confidentiality within physiotherapy: perceptions and attitudes of clinical practitioners.

Authors:  S Cross; J Sim
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Using focus groups to develop a heart disease prevention program for ethnically diverse, low-income women.

Authors:  L Gettleman; M A Winkleby
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2000-12

3.  Understanding HIV-related risk among persons with a severe and persistent mental illness: insights from qualitative inquiry.

Authors:  C M Gordon; M P Carey; K B Carey; S A Maisto; L S Weinhardt
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.254

4.  Standardizing contact investigation protocols.

Authors:  L B Gerald; F Bruce; C M Brooks; N Brook; M E Kimerling; R A Windsor; W C Bailey
Journal:  Int J Tuberc Lung Dis       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Barriers to colorectal cancer screening with fecal occult blood testing in a predominantly minority urban population: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Corey H Brouse; Charles E Basch; Randi L Wolf; Celia Shmukler; Alfred I Neugut; Steven Shea
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 9.308

6.  A computerized intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening for underserved populations: theoretical background and algorithm development.

Authors:  K Allen Greiner; Mugur V Geana; Aaron Epp; Angela Watson; Melissa Filippi; Christine Makosky Daley; Kimberly K Engelman; Aimee S James; Marci Campbell
Journal:  Technol Health Care       Date:  2012       Impact factor: 1.285

7.  Contextualizing an expanded definition of health literacy among adolescents in the health care setting.

Authors:  Philip M Massey; Michael Prelip; Brian M Calimlim; Elaine S Quiter; Deborah C Glik
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2012-05-21

8.  Focus group: implications for program evaluation of mental health services.

Authors:  J M Richter; D J Bottenberg; K A Roberto
Journal:  J Ment Health Adm       Date:  1991

9.  Multiple Comorbidities and Interest in Research Participation Among Clients of a Nonprofit Food Distribution Site.

Authors:  Robin T Higashi; Simon J Craddock Lee; Tammy Leonard; Erica L Cuate; Jay Cole; Sandi L Pruitt
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 4.689

10.  Parent-identified barriers to pediatric health care: a process-oriented model.

Authors:  Elisa J Sobo; Michael Seid; Leticia Reyes Gelhard
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.