Literature DB >> 11566242

Value of the CT angiography in the diagnosis of common carotid artery bifurcation disease: CT angiography versus digital subtraction angiography and color flow Doppler.

R Moll1, H P Dinkel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: assessment of the degree of stenosis is the central point in the treatment of carotid stenosis. The purpose of our study was to assess whether invasive CT angiography (CTA) is a feasible alternative to the current invasive gold standard carotid digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and the current non-invasive gold standard color flow doppler. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: about 178 patients with cerebrovascular disease underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA), CFD and CTA. CTA was performed on a Somatom plus 4 (Siemens, Erlangen Germany). CT was performed with 2/3/2 (collimation/table feed/reconstruction interval) or 2/3/1 mm, start delay 15-20 s, flow 2.5-3.0 ml/s, using 120 ml non-ionic contrast medium (300 mg J/ml). Quantification of degree of stenosis was based on the perfused area in the axial slices. Plaque morphology (soft and hard) and ulceration were evaluated.
RESULTS: CTA detected nine cases of significant stenosis, which had been underestimated by DSA. CTA failed in two cases of a membraneous stenosis, which were underestimated, and in two cases with teeth artifacts. Calcifications were more readily appreciated by CTA than in CFD. In this respect, both methods were superior to DSA. CFD, DSA and CTA had a sensitivity of 100% for occlusions, respectively.
CONCLUSION: CT angiography is useful in case of inconclusive CFD in the pre- and postoperative phase, and as a third modality in case of disagreement between DSA and CFD.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11566242     DOI: 10.1016/s0720-048x(01)00302-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  10 in total

1.  Multi-detector row CT angiography in the assessment of carotid artery disease in symptomatic patients: comparison with rotational angiography and digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Marja Berg; Zishu Zhang; Aki Ikonen; Petri Sipola; Reetta Kälviäinen; Hannu Manninen; Ritva Vanninen
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Dual-energy CT head bone and hard plaque removal for quantification of calcified carotid stenosis: utility and comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  Kensuke Uotani; Yoshiyuki Watanabe; Masahiro Higashi; Tetsuro Nakazawa; Atsushi K Kono; Yoshiro Hori; Tetsuya Fukuda; Suzu Kanzaki; Naoaki Yamada; Toshihide Itoh; Kazuro Sugimura; Hiroaki Naito
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Systematic review of preoperative carotid duplex ultrasound compared with computed tomography carotid angiography for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  T Forjoe; M Asad Rahi
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2019-02-15       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  CT angiographic analysis of carotid artery stenosis: comparison of manual assessment, semiautomatic vessel analysis, and digital subtraction angiography.

Authors:  H M Silvennoinen; S Ikonen; L Soinne; M Railo; L Valanne
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.825

5.  Pathology and vulnerability of atherosclerotic plaque: identification, treatment options, and individual patient differences for prevention of stroke.

Authors:  Saami K Yazdani; Marc Vorpahl; Elena Ladich; Renu Virmani
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2010-06

Review 6.  Ultrasound and angiography in the selection of patients for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  Andrei V Alexandrov
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.931

7.  Combined use of color duplex ultrasonography and B-flow imaging for evaluation of patients with carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  Muharrem Tola; Mehmet Yurdakul; Turhan Cumhur
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 8.  Duplex ultrasound for diagnosing symptomatic carotid stenosis in the extracranial segments.

Authors:  Nicolle Cassola; Jose Cc Baptista-Silva; Luis Cu Nakano; Carolina Dq Flumignan; Ricardo Sesso; Vladimir Vasconcelos; Nelson Carvas Junior; Ronald Lg Flumignan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-07-11

Review 9.  Advanced neuroimaging to guide acute stroke therapy.

Authors:  Gurpreet Singh Sandhu; Jeffrey L Sunshine
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Carotid artery stenosis: reproducibility of automated 3D CT angiography analysis method.

Authors:  Zishu Zhang; Marja H Berg; Aki E J Ikonen; Ritva L Vanninen; Hannu I Manninen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 5.315

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.