Literature DB >> 11560071

Non-invasive cardiac output evaluation during a maximal progressive exercise test, using a new impedance cardiograph device.

R Richard1, E Lonsdorfer-Wolf, A Charloux, S Doutreleau, M Buchheit, M Oswald-Mammosser, E Lampert, B Mettauer, B Geny, J Lonsdorfer.   

Abstract

One of the greatest challenges in exercise physiology is to develop a valid, reliable, non-invasive and affordable measurement of cardiac output (CO). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reproducibility and accuracy of a new impedance cardiograph device, the Physio Flow, during a 1-min step incremental exercise test from rest to maximal peak effort. A group of 12 subjects was evaluated to determine the reproducibility of the method as follows: (1) each subject performed two comparable tests while their CO was measured by impedance cardiography using the new device (COImp1, COImp2), and (2) in a subgroup of 7 subjects CO was also determined by the direct Fick method (COFick) during the second test. The mean difference between the values obtained by impedance (i.e. COImp1-COImp2) was -0.009 l.min-1 (95% confidence interval: -4.2 l.min-1, 4.2 l.min-1), and CO ranged from 3.55 l.min-1 to 26.75 l.min-1 (n = 146). When expressed as a percentage, the difference (COImp1-COImp2) did not vary with increasing CO. The correlation coefficient between the values of COImp and COFick obtained during the second exercise test was r = 0.94 (P < 0.01, n = 50). The mean difference expressed as percentage was -2.78% (95% confidence interval: -27.44%, 21.78%). We conclude that COImp provides a clinically acceptable evaluation of CO in healthy subjects during an incremental exercise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11560071     DOI: 10.1007/s004210100458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  72 in total

1.  Hemodynamics during active and passive recovery from a single bout of supramaximal exercise.

Authors:  Antonio Crisafulli; Valentina Orrù; Franco Melis; Filippo Tocco; Alberto Concu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-03-04       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  A comparative assessment of two techniques for investigating initial cardiovascular reflexes under acute orthostatic stress.

Authors:  Caroline A Rickards; David G Newman
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-07-19       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Cardiac output and oxygen release during very high-intensity exercise performed until exhaustion.

Authors:  Ruddy Richard; Evelyne Lonsdorfer-Wolf; Stéphane Dufour; Stéphane Doutreleau; Monique Oswald-Mammosser; Véronique L Billat; Jean Lonsdorfer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-07-27       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Increase in maximal oxygen uptake following 2-week walk training with blood flow occlusion in athletes.

Authors:  Saejong Park; Jong Kyung Kim; Hyun Min Choi; Hyun Gook Kim; Matthew D Beekley; Hosung Nho
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Expiratory muscle loading increases intercostal muscle blood flow during leg exercise in healthy humans.

Authors:  Dimitris Athanasopoulos; Zafeiris Louvaris; Evgenia Cherouveim; Vasilis Andrianopoulos; Charis Roussos; Spyros Zakynthinos; Ioannis Vogiatzis
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2010-05-27

6.  Application of bioreactance for cardiac output assessment during exercise in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Adrian Elliott; James H Hull; David Nunan; Djordje G Jakovljevic; David Brodie; Lesley Ansley
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Hemodynamic adjustments during breath-holding in trained divers.

Authors:  Guillaume Costalat; Jeremy Coquart; Ingrid Castres; Claire Tourny; Frederic Lemaitre
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Left Ventricular Function Before and After Aerobic Exercise Training in Women With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

Authors:  Joshua G Woolstenhulme; Andrew A Guccione; Jeffrey E Herrick; John P Collins; Steven D Nathan; Leighton Chan; Randall E Keyser
Journal:  J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.081

9.  Inconsistent approach to evaluating studies and selective interpretation of data reveals lack of objectivity and undermines repeated attempts to discredit SPV.

Authors:  Lauren A Jenkins; Alexis R Mauger; James G Hopker
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Evaluation of Impedance Cardiography for Measurement of Stroke Volume in Congenital Heart Disease.

Authors:  Mohammed Ebrahim; Sanjeet Hegde; Beth Printz; Mark Abcede; James A Proudfoot; Christopher Davis
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2016-08-25       Impact factor: 1.655

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.