Literature DB >> 11559914

Aspects of biopsy procedures prior to preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

A De Vos1, A Van Steirteghem.   

Abstract

Today, preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) is offered in over 40 centres worldwide for an expanded range of genetic defects causing disease. This very early form of prenatal diagnosis involves the detection of affected embryos by fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) (sex determination or chromosomal defects) or by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (monogenic diseases) prior to implantation. Genetic analysis of the embryos involves the removal of some cellular mass from the embryos (one or two blastomeres at cleavage-stage or some extra-embryonic trophectoderm cells at the blastocyst stage) by means of an embryo biopsy procedure. Genetic analysis can also be performed preconceptionally by removal of the first polar body. However, additional information is then often gained by removal of the second polar body and/or a blastomere from the embryo. Removal of polar bodies or cellular material from embryos requires an opening in the zona pellucida, which can be created in a mechanical way (partial zona dissection) or chemical way (acidic Tyrode's solution). However, the more recent introduction of laser technology has facilitated this step enormously. Different biopsy procedures at different preimplantation stages are reviewed here, including their pros and cons and their clinical applications. The following aspects will also be discussed: safety of zona drilling by laser, use of Ca2+/Mg2+-free medium for decompaction, and removal of one or two cells from cleavage-stage embryos. Copyright 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11559914     DOI: 10.1002/pd.172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  16 in total

1.  Singling out genetic disorders and disease.

Authors:  Martine De Rycke
Journal:  Genome Med       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 11.117

2.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in female and male carriers of reciprocal translocations: clinical outcome until delivery of 312 cycles.

Authors:  Kathelijn Keymolen; Catherine Staessen; Willem Verpoest; Inge Liebaers; Maryse Bonduelle
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.246

3.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) for Huntington's disease: the experience of three European centres.

Authors:  Maartje C Van Rij; Marjan De Rademaeker; Céline Moutou; Jos C F M Dreesen; Martine De Rycke; Inge Liebaers; Joep P M Geraedts; Christine E M De Die-Smulders; Stéphane Viville
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 4.246

4.  Slow and ultrarapid cryopreservation of biopsied mouse blastocysts and its effect on DNA integrity index.

Authors:  Amr Kader; Tommaso Falcone; Rakesh K Sharma; Devna Mangrola; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2010-05-30       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Clinical application of next-generation sequencing in preimplantation genetic diagnosis cycles for Robertsonian and reciprocal translocations.

Authors:  Wenke Zhang; Ying Liu; Li Wang; Hui Wang; Minyue Ma; Mengnan Xu; Xiaofei Xu; ZhiYing Gao; Jinliang Duan; David S Cram; Yuanqing Yao
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 6.  Implementing PGD/PGD-A in IVF clinics: considerations for the best laboratory approach and management.

Authors:  Antonio Capalbo; Valeria Romanelli; Danilo Cimadomo; Laura Girardi; Marta Stoppa; Lisa Dovere; Domenico Dell'Edera; Filippo Maria Ubaldi; Laura Rienzi
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2016-07-16       Impact factor: 3.412

7.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis for myotonic dystrophy type 1: upon request to child.

Authors:  Marjan De Rademaeker; Willem Verpoest; Martine De Rycke; Sara Seneca; Karen Sermon; Sonja Desmyttere; Maryse Bonduelle; Josianne Van der Elst; Paul Devroey; Inge Liebaers
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 4.246

Review 8.  The why, the how and the when of PGS 2.0: current practices and expert opinions of fertility specialists, molecular biologists, and embryologists.

Authors:  Karen Sermon; Antonio Capalbo; Jacques Cohen; Edith Coonen; Martine De Rycke; Anick De Vos; Joy Delhanty; Francesco Fiorentino; Norbert Gleicher; Georg Griesinger; Jamie Grifo; Alan Handyside; Joyce Harper; Georgia Kokkali; Sebastiaan Mastenbroek; David Meldrum; Marcos Meseguer; Markus Montag; Santiago Munné; Laura Rienzi; Carmen Rubio; Katherine Scott; Richard Scott; Carlos Simon; Jason Swain; Nathan Treff; Filippo Ubaldi; Rita Vassena; Joris Robert Vermeesch; Willem Verpoest; Dagan Wells; Joep Geraedts
Journal:  Mol Hum Reprod       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.025

9.  The effect of blastomere biopsy on preimplantation mouse embryo development and global gene expression.

Authors:  Francesca E Duncan; Paula Stein; Carmen J Williams; Richard M Schultz
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-09-06       Impact factor: 7.329

10.  Delivery of a chromosomally normal child from an oocyte with reciprocal aneuploid polar bodies.

Authors:  Richard T Scott; Nathan R Treff; John Stevens; Eric J Forman; Kathleen H Hong; Mandy G Katz-Jaffe; William B Schoolcraft
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.