Literature DB >> 11554677

Seeing mountains in mole hills: geographical-slant perception.

D R Proffitt1, S H Creem, W D Zosh.   

Abstract

When observers face directly toward the incline of a hill, their awareness of the slant of the hill is greatly overestimated, but motoric estimates are much more accurate. The present study examined whether similar results would be found when observers were allowed to view the side of a hill. Observers viewed the cross-sections of hills in real (Experiment 1) and virtual (Experiment 2) environments and estimated the inclines with verbal estimates, by adjusting the cross-section of a disk, and by adjusting a board with their unseen hand to match the inclines. We found that the results for cross-section viewing replicated those found when observers directly face the incline. Even though the angles of hills are directly evident when viewed from the side, slant perceptions are still grossly overestimated.

Keywords:  NASA Center ARC; NASA Discipline Space Human Factors

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11554677     DOI: 10.1111/1467-9280.00377

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  11 in total

1.  The natural appearance of unnatural incline speed.

Authors:  Doug Rohrer
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-07

2.  Skating down a steeper slope: fear influences the perception of geographical slant.

Authors:  Jeanine K Stefanucci; Dennis R Proffitt; Gerald L Clore; Nazish Parekh
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

3.  Direct evidence for the economy of action: glucose and the perception of geographical slant.

Authors:  Simone Schnall; Jonathan R Zadra; Dennis R Proffitt
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 1.490

4.  Perceptual calibration for immersive display environments.

Authors:  Kevin Ponto; Michael Gleicher; Robert G Radwin; Hyun Joon Shin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 4.579

5.  Long lasting egocentric disorientation induced by normal sensori-motor spatial interaction.

Authors:  Eve Dupierrix; Michael Gresty; Théophile Ohlmann; Sylvie Chokron
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Large manual pointing errors, but accurate verbal reports, for indications of target azimuth.

Authors:  John Philbeck; Jesse Sargent; Joeanna Arthur; Steve Dopkins
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Anchoring in action: manual estimates of slant are powerfully biased toward initial hand orientation and are correlated with verbal report.

Authors:  Dennis M Shaffer; Eric McManama; Charles Swank; Morgan Williams; Frank H Durgin
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.332

8.  Bringing the real world into the fMRI scanner: repetition effects for pictures versus real objects.

Authors:  Jacqueline C Snow; Charles E Pettypiece; Teresa D McAdam; Adam D McLean; Patrick W Stroman; Melvyn A Goodale; Jody C Culham
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  The economy of social resources and its influence on spatial perceptions.

Authors:  Elizabeth B Gross; Dennis Proffitt
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-11-19       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Maintaining warm, trusting relationships with brands: increased temperature perceptions after thinking of communal brands.

Authors:  Hans IJzerman; Janneke A Janssen; James A Coan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.