Literature DB >> 11554496

Smoke alarm ownership and installation: a comparison of a rural and a suburban community in Georgia.

A R Jones1, C J Thompson, M K Davis.   

Abstract

As part of a smoke alarm giveaway and installation program (The Get-Alarmed Campaign), a total of 454 households were surveyed in two counties in Georgia, one metropolitan and one nonmetropolitan. The targeted communities in these counties had a high prevalence of low-income and minority populations and thus were at high risk of house fire-related morbidity and mortality. The objectives of the program were to determine the prevalence of and predictors for installed, functioning smoke alarms, and to install at least one smoke alarm and/or smoke alarm batteries in 100% of participating homes in need. Characteristics associated with smoke alarm ownership included home ownership, having a higher income, and having a central heating source, factors which should be considered in targeting future intervention strategies. At onset, 159/454 households (35.0%) had no smoke alarms installed and 56/275 households with existing smoke alarms (20.4%) had none that were functional. Regardless of ownership status, a free smoke alarm was installed in the household of 93.8% of participants and new batteries were installed in existing smoke alarms for 31.7% of participants. This project illustrates the usefulness of a door-to-door campaign in increasing smoke alarm ownership in both a rural and a suburban community with a high concentration of residents at high risk of house fire-related morbidity and mortality.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11554496     DOI: 10.1023/a:1010478116532

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  20 in total

1.  The U.S. experience with smoke detectors: who has them? How well do they work? When don't they work?

Authors:  J R Hall
Journal:  NFPA J       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct

2.  Correlates of reported smoke detector usage in an inner-city population: participants in a smoke detector give-away program.

Authors:  K N Shaw; M C McCormick; S L Kustra; R M Ruddy; R D Casey
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Residential smoke alarms and fire escape plans.

Authors:  P A Harvey; J J Sacks; G W Ryan; P F Bender
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

4.  Deaths resulting from residential fires and the prevalence of smoke alarms--United States, 1991-1995.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1998-10-02       Impact factor: 17.586

5.  Prevalence of smoke detectors in private residences--DeKalb County, Georgia, 1985.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1986-07-18       Impact factor: 17.586

6.  Comparison of community based smoke detector distribution methods in an urban community.

Authors:  M R Douglas; S Mallonee; G R Istre
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.399

7.  Preventing death and injury from fires with automatic sprinklers and smoke detectors. Council on Scientific Affairs.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987-03-27       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Fire fatalities in older people.

Authors:  G McGwin; V Chapman; J Curtis; M Rousculp
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.562

9.  Risk factors for fatal residential fires.

Authors:  C W Runyan; S I Bangdiwala; M A Linzer; J J Sacks; J Butts
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1992-09-17       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Fire fatality study: demographics of fire victims.

Authors:  D J Barillo; R Goode
Journal:  Burns       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.744

View more
  9 in total

1.  Strategies to increase smoke alarm use in high-risk households.

Authors:  Pauline A Harvey; Mary Aitken; George W Ryan; Lori A Demeter; Jeanne Givens; Ramya Sundararaman; Scott Goulette
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2004-10

2.  When one is not enough: prevalence and characteristics of homes not adequately protected by smoke alarms.

Authors:  C Peek-Asa; V Allareddy; J Yang; C Taylor; J Lundell; C Zwerling
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.399

3.  Road safety campaigns: do they work?

Authors:  P Chinnock
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 4.  It might work in Oklahoma but will it work in Oakhampton? Context and implementation in the effectiveness literature on domestic smoke detectors.

Authors:  L Arai; K Roen; H Roberts; J Popay
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 5.  Bridging the gap between research and practice: a continuing challenge.

Authors:  S Mallonee; C Fowler; G R Istre
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.399

Review 6.  Evaluated community fire safety interventions in the United States: a review of current literature.

Authors:  Van M Ta; Shannon Frattaroli; Gwendolyn Bergen; Andrea Carlson Gielen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2006-06

7.  Fire and scald burn risks in urban communities: who is at risk and what do they believe about home safety?

Authors:  E M Parker; A C Gielen; E M McDonald; W C Shields; A R Trump; K M Koon; V Jones
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2013-03-13

8.  Increasing smoke alarm operability through theory-based health education: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ted R Miller; Gwen Bergen; Michael F Ballesteros; Soma Bhattacharya; Andrea Carlson Gielen; Monique S Sheppard
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Do smoke alarms still function a year after installation? A follow-up of the get-alarmed campaign.

Authors:  Corleen J Thompson; Alma R Jones; Mary Kidd Davis; Lee S Caplan
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2004-04
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.