Literature DB >> 15065735

Do smoke alarms still function a year after installation? A follow-up of the get-alarmed campaign.

Corleen J Thompson1, Alma R Jones, Mary Kidd Davis, Lee S Caplan.   

Abstract

The Get-Alarmed Campaign Follow-up Study was the second phase of an initiative to assure that homes of families at high risk of fire-related injury and death had functioning smoke alarms. Smoke alarms and/or batteries were installed in over 94 percent of 454 participating households in Schley and Henry Counties, Georgia, in 2000. Before the study began, 60.6 percent of these homes had smoke alarms, but only 36.6 percent had functioning smoke alarms. The follow-up study was designed to determine the experiences of participants with smoke alarms and whether participating households had functioning smoke alarms a year after baseline. Participants were phoned or visited and asked about their experiences with smoke alarms since the baseline study. During the interview, they were asked to test a smoke alarm, the results of which could frequently be heard. Respondents included 237 from Schley County and 113 from Henry County, for an overall 77.1 percent response rate. While 80.3 percent of respondents had a smoke alarm that was heard by the interviewer when it was tested, 6.6 percent reported that their smoke alarm had been disabled or had a dead battery. Over 75 percent of respondents had smoke alarm sound offs in the prior year, predominately due to cooking smoke, but only about 5 percent reported removing the battery or otherwise disabling it to prevent sound offs. However, the measures taken may render a household unprotected at a critical time. Efforts to increase protection with smoke alarms should be augmented with programs to insure adequate and timely testing and maintenance of existing smoke alarms.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15065735     DOI: 10.1023/b:johe.0000016720.38681.61

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Community Health        ISSN: 0094-5145


  9 in total

1.  Smoke alarm maintenance in low-income families.

Authors:  A Mickalide; A Validzic
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Estimating the proportion of homes with functioning smoke alarms: a comparison of telephone survey and household survey results.

Authors:  M R Douglas; S Mallonee; G R Istre
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Smoke alarm ownership and installation: a comparison of a rural and a suburban community in Georgia.

Authors:  A R Jones; C J Thompson; M K Davis
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2001-10

4.  Correlates of reported smoke detector usage in an inner-city population: participants in a smoke detector give-away program.

Authors:  K N Shaw; M C McCormick; S L Kustra; R M Ruddy; R D Casey
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Residential smoke alarms and fire escape plans.

Authors:  P A Harvey; J J Sacks; G W Ryan; P F Bender
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

6.  Deaths resulting from residential fires and the prevalence of smoke alarms--United States, 1991-1995.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1998-10-02       Impact factor: 17.586

7.  Comparison of community based smoke detector distribution methods in an urban community.

Authors:  M R Douglas; S Mallonee; G R Istre
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.399

8.  Finding homes without smoke detectors: one step in planning burn prevention programs.

Authors:  R H McKnight; T W Struttmann; J R Mays
Journal:  J Burn Care Rehabil       Date:  1995 Sep-Oct

9.  Evaluation of three smoke detector promotion programs.

Authors:  R A Shults; J J Sacks; L A Briske; P H Dickey; M R Kinde; S Mallonee; M R Douglas
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.043

  9 in total
  5 in total

Review 1.  Evaluated community fire safety interventions in the United States: a review of current literature.

Authors:  Van M Ta; Shannon Frattaroli; Gwendolyn Bergen; Andrea Carlson Gielen
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2006-06

2.  Evaluation of fire-safety programs that use 10-year smoke alarms.

Authors:  Mark Jackson; Jonathan Wilson; Judith Akoto; Sherry Dixon; David E Jacobs; Michael F Ballesteros
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2010-10

3.  Using GIS to evaluate a fire safety program in North Carolina.

Authors:  Thomas Dudley; Kathleen Creppage; Meghan Shanahan; Scott Proescholdbell
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2013-10

4.  Smoke alarm giveaway and installation programs: an economic evaluation.

Authors:  Ying Liu; Karin A Mack; Shane T Diekman
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 5.043

5.  Increasing smoke alarm operability through theory-based health education: a randomised trial.

Authors:  Ted R Miller; Gwen Bergen; Michael F Ballesteros; Soma Bhattacharya; Andrea Carlson Gielen; Monique S Sheppard
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 3.710

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.