Literature DB >> 11550743

The ties that bind what is known to the recognition of what is new.

D L Nelson1, N Zhang, V M McKinney.   

Abstract

Recognition success varies with how information is encoded (e.g., level of processing) and with what is already known as a result of past learning (e.g., word frequency). This article presents the results of experiments showing that preexisting connections involving the associates of studied words facilitate their recognition regardless of whether the words are intentionally encoded or are incidentally encoded under semantic or nonsemantic conditions. Words are more likely to be recognized when they have either more resonant connections coming back to them from their associates or more connections among their associates. Such results occur even though attention is never drawn to these associates. Regression analyses showed that these connections affect recognition independently of frequency, so the present results add to the literature showing that prior lexical knowledge contributes to episodic recognition. In addition, equations that use free-association data to derive composite strength indices of resonance and connectivity were evaluated. Implications for theories of recognition are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11550743     DOI: 10.1037//0278-7393.27.5.1147

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn        ISSN: 0278-7393            Impact factor:   3.051


  14 in total

1.  Experiencing a word can prime its accessibility and its associative connections to related words.

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Leilani B Goodmon
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-04

2.  Are implicitly activated associates selectively activated?

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Vanesa M McKinney; Cathy L McEvoy
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-03

3.  The role of recollection and familiarity in the context variability mirror effect.

Authors:  Gabriel I Cook; Richard L Marsh; Jason L Hicks
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

4.  Recursive reminding: effects of repetition, printed frequency, connectivity, and set size on recognition and judgments of frequency.

Authors:  Serena L Fisher; Douglas L Nelson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-03

5.  How implicitly activated and explicitly acquired knowledge contribute to the effectiveness of retrieval cues.

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Serena L Fisher; Umit Akirmak
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

6.  Implicitly activated memories are associated to general context cues.

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Leilani B Goodmon; Umit Akirmak
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-12

7.  How activation, entanglement, and searching a semantic network contribute to event memory.

Authors:  Douglas L Nelson; Kirsty Kitto; David Galea; Cathy L McEvoy; Peter D Bruza
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2013-08

8.  Word frequency and word likeness mirror effects in episodic recognition memory.

Authors:  Andrew Heathcote; Elizabeth Ditton; Kristie Mitchell
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2006-06

9.  Developmental differences in the effects of phonological, lexical and semantic variables on word learning by infants.

Authors:  Holly L Storkel
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2008-09-02

10.  Scale-invariant transition probabilities in free word association trajectories.

Authors:  Martin Elias Costa; Flavia Bonomo; Mariano Sigman
Journal:  Front Integr Neurosci       Date:  2009-09-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.