Literature DB >> 11547112

Buccal mucosal grafts: lessons learned from an 8-year experience.

M J Metro1, H Y Wu, H M Snyder, S A Zderic, D A Canning.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: We evaluated our 8-year experience with buccal mucosal grafts in complex hypospadias and epispadias repair.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the records of 29 patients in whom a total of 30 buccal mucosal grafts were placed as part of urethral reconstruction between 1991 and 1999. At surgery 16 tubes and 14 onlays were constructed and 24 of 30 repairs involved the meatus. All patients were followed at least 6 months postoperatively (median 5.3 years). Beginning in 1995 meatal design was enlarged to a racquet handle shape and patients were asked to perform meatal self-dilation for 6 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: Complications developed in 17 of our 30 cases (57%) and reoperation was done in 10 (33%). All complications were evident by 11 months postoperatively except 1 that presented as recurrent stricture disease at 3 years. Complications developed in 5 and 12 of 15 patients who underwent surgery between 1995 and 1999, and before 1995, respectively (p = 0.027). No patient has had meatal stenosis since 1995. Complications included meatal stenosis in 5 cases, stricture in 7, glanuloplasty, meatal and complete graft breakdown in 1 each, and fistula in 2. Onlays were more likely to result in stricture than tube grafts (6 of 14 cases versus 1 of 16, p = 0.034).
CONCLUSIONS: The complication and reoperation rates of buccal mucosal grafts are 57% and 33% at 5 years of followup. Changes in meatal design and temporary postoperative meatal dilation have improved the outcome in the last 5 years. Buccal mucosa remains a good choice in patients who require extragenital skin for urethral reconstruction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11547112     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(05)65809-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Concepts for correction of penile hypospadias].

Authors:  M Fisch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 2.  [Penile- and urethral anomalies].

Authors:  S Perovic; N Djakovic; M Hohenfellner
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  [Management of urethral strictures].

Authors:  C Gozzi; S Tritschler; P J Bastian; C G Stief
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  A new option for the management of urethral trauma: primary reconstruction of posterior urethral disruption with a buccal mucosa transplant.

Authors:  B Stürzebecher; H Schulte-Baukloh; V Brenneke; T Stolze; C Weiss; H H Knispel
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Treatment of adults with complications from previous hypospadias surgery.

Authors:  Jeremy B Myers; Jack W McAninch; Bradley A Erickson; Benjamin N Breyer
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-06-13       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  A novel technique for repair of mid-penile hypospadias using a preputial skin flap: results of 110 patients.

Authors:  Hazem Elmoghazy; Mohamed M Hussein; Elnisr Mohamed; Abdelbasset Badawy; Gamal Alsagheer; Ahmed Mamdouh Abd Elhamed
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-09-13       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Redo hypospadias repair: experience at a tertiary care children's hospital.

Authors:  Ahmed Al-Sayyad; John G Pike; Michael P Leonard
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 1.862

8.  A comparative study of the use of a transverse preputial island flap (the Duckett technique) to treat primary and secondary hypospadias in older Chinese patients with severe chordee.

Authors:  Da-chao Zheng; Hao Wang; Mu-jun Lu; Qi Chen; Yan-bo Chen; Xiao-min Ren; Hai-jun Yao; Ming-xi Xu; Ke Zhang; Zhi-kang Cai; Zhong Wang
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2012-11-23       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  Hypospadias repair: an overview of the actual techniques.

Authors:  Ramnath Subramaniam; Anne Francoise Spinoit; Piet Hoebeke
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.314

10.  Two-stage repair for proximal hypospadias: a reappraisal.

Authors:  Saul P Greenfield
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.862

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.