Literature DB >> 18542762

Redo hypospadias repair: experience at a tertiary care children's hospital.

Ahmed Al-Sayyad1, John G Pike, Michael P Leonard.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Treatment of patients with failed hypospadias repairs can be challenging. Our study aimed to determine the best type of redo repair depending on the location and size of the urethral meatus, the status of the urethral plate and genital skin, the severity of residual chordee and the amount of scar tissue.
METHODS: The Institutional Review Board approved our retrospective chart review of patients who had a redo hypospadias repair at our institution over the past 6 years. We recorded the type and number of previous repair(s), the type and number of redo procedure(s),as well as the complications and functional outcomes.
RESULTS: There were 28 patients, aged 1-12 (mean 3.8) years, with failed hypospadias repairs. The initial severity of the hypospadias were as follows: perineal (1), penoscrotal (9), proximal shaft (1), mid-shaft (9), distal shaft (4), coronal (3) and mega-meatus (1). Of all the patients, 24 had 1 repair, 3 had 2 repairs and 1 had 3 repairs. The initial repairs comprised 11 tubularized island flaps (TIFs), 8 Snodgrass tubularized incised plate (TIP) techniques, 5 Mathieu repairs, 1 Meatal Advancement and GlanuloPlasty Incorporated (MAGPI) technique, 1 Pyramid, 1 Arap technique and 1 Thiersch-Duplay repair. Twenty-one of 28 patients had 1 redo operation, 5 had 2 redo operations, 1 had 3 redo operations and 1 had 4 redo operations, for a total of 38 redo operations. Of these, 26 were TIP techniques (68.4%), 3 were Mathieu (7.9%), 3 were TIF repairs (7.9%), 2 were onlay island flaps (5.3%) and 4 were buccal mucosal grafts (10.5%). Follow-up was 1-5 years (mean 3.5 yr). The final locations of urethral meatus included glans (18), corona (6), mid-shaft (3) and penoscrotal (1). Complications after redo surgery comprised 4 urethrocutaneous fistulae, 2 meatal stenoses, 1 urethral stricture and 3 dehiscences. Sixteen patients were followed with yearly uroflow with a Q-mean (mean uroflow) range of 3-14 mL/s (mean 8.1 mL/s).
CONCLUSION: The majority of hypospadias failures can be salvaged with one operation. The TIP repair is our procedure of choice in most cases. In the setting of a poor urethral plate, TIF or buccal mucosa may be necessary. Complications are not infrequent in redo procedures.

Entities:  

Year:  2007        PMID: 18542762      PMCID: PMC2422928     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J        ISSN: 1911-6470            Impact factor:   1.862


  9 in total

1.  Tubularized incised-plate urethroplasty for hypospadias reoperation.

Authors:  W T Snodgrass; A Lorenzo
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 5.588

2.  Tubularized incised plate repair: functional outcome after intermediate followup.

Authors:  Hisham M Hammouda; Alaa El-Ghoneimi; Darius J Bagli; Gordon A McLorie; Antoine E Khoury
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Re-operative hypospadias repair using the Snodgrass incised plate urethroplasty.

Authors:  A M Shanberg; K Sanderson; B Duel
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Buccal mucosal grafts: lessons learned from an 8-year experience.

Authors:  M J Metro; H Y Wu; H M Snyder; S A Zderic; D A Canning
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Tubularized incised plate urethroplasty: expanded use in primary and repeat surgery for hypospadias.

Authors:  J G Borer; S B Bauer; C A Peters; D A Diamond; A Atala; B G Cilento; A B Retik
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 7.450

6.  Repair of hypospadias complications using the previously utilized urethral plate.

Authors:  G R Simmons; M P Cain; A J Casale; M A Keating; M C Adams; R C Rink
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Can previously relocated penile skin be successfully used for salvage hypospadias repair?

Authors:  V R Jayanthi; G A McLorie; A E Khoury; B M Churchill
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Repair of the complications of hypospadias surgery.

Authors:  C L Secrest; G H Jordan; B H Winslow; C E Horton; J B McCraw; D A Gilbert; C J Devine
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 9.  Hypospadias repair: the two-stage alternative.

Authors:  A Bracka
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1995-12
  9 in total
  2 in total

1.  Urethral fistula following circumcision: salvaged by buccal mucosa graft urethroplasty.

Authors:  Rahul Janak Sinha; Divakar Dalela; S N Sankhwar; Vishwajeet Singh
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2009-05-02       Impact factor: 0.656

2.  Regenerative urethroplasty in reoperative hypospadias: Buried strip principle revisited.

Authors:  Uday S Chatterjee; Subir K Chatterjee
Journal:  J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg       Date:  2012-04
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.