Literature DB >> 11545754

Effect of gender on the outcomes of contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention.

E D Peterson1, A J Lansky, J Kramer, K Anstrom, M J Lanzilotta.   

Abstract

Limited information exists regarding the outcomes of newer percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) technologies in women. This study sought to determine whether female gender is an independent risk factor for PCI mortality and/or complications in contemporary practice. Using information from the National Cardiovascular Network (NCN) Database on 109,708 (33% women) PCI cases from 22 hospitals between January 1994 and January 1998, we examined the association of gender with unadjusted and risk-adjusted procedural outcomes. Women undergoing PCI were older, smaller, and had more comorbid illness than men, but less extensive coronary disease. Temporal trends in PCI device selection were similar in men and women. Compared with men, women had higher unadjusted procedural mortality rates (1.8% vs 1.0%, p <0.001), more strokes (0.4% vs 0.2%, p <0.001), and higher vascular complication rates (5.4% vs 2.7%, p <0.001). However, after adjusting for baseline clinical risk factors, and importantly, body surface area, women and men had similar PCI mortality risks (adjusted odds ratio 1.07, 95% confidence interval 0.92 to 1.24). Gender was not an independent risk factor for mortality among subgroups receiving coronary stent or atherectomy devices after risk adjustment. However, women undergoing PCI remained at higher risk for stroke, vascular complications, and repeat in-hospital revascularization than men, even after risk adjustment. We conclude that in contemporary practice, a patient's body size rather than gender, conveys independent risk for mortality after PCI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11545754     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(01)01679-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  28 in total

1.  Coronary heart disease in women.

Authors:  Ghada W Mikhail
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-09-03

2.  Impact of gender difference on long-term outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention for coronary artery disease in patients under statin treatment.

Authors:  Hideki Wada; Manabu Ogita; Katsumi Miyauchi; Jun Shitara; Hirohisa Endo; Shinichiro Doi; Ryo Naito; Hirokazu Konishi; Shuta Tsuboi; Tomotaka Dohi; Takatoshi Kasai; Hiroshi Tamura; Shinya Okazaki; Kikuo Isoda; Satoru Suwa; Hiroyuki Daida
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2016-04-23       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 3.  Coronary artery disease in women: From the yentl syndrome to contemporary treatment.

Authors:  Sofia Vaina; Anastasios Milkas; Christina Crysohoou; Christodoulos Stefanadis
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-01-26

4.  Is the difference in outcome between men and women treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention age dependent? Gender difference in STEMI stratified on age.

Authors:  Amber M Otten; Angela H E M Maas; Jan Paul Ottervanger; Anita Kloosterman; Arnoud W J van 't Hof; Jan Henk E Dambrink; A T Marcel Gosselink; Jan C A Hoorntje; Harry Suryapranata; Menko Jan de Boer
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2013-01-31

5.  The effect of gender on outcomes of aortoiliac artery interventions for claudication.

Authors:  Venkataramu N Krishnamurthy; Muhammad Naeem; Timothy P Murphy; Joselyn Cerezo; Paul Gaither Jordan; Suzanne H Goldberg; Abby G Ershow; Alan T Hirsch; Niki Oldenburg; Donald E Cutlip
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 1.605

6.  Sex-Based Differences in Presentation, Treatment, and Complications Among Older Adults Hospitalized for Acute Myocardial Infarction: The SILVER-AMI Study.

Authors:  Michael G Nanna; Alexandra M Hajduk; Harlan M Krumholz; Terrence E Murphy; Rachel P Dreyer; Karen P Alexander; Mary Geda; Sui Tsang; Francine K Welty; Basmah Safdar; Dharshan K Lakshminarayan; Sarwat I Chaudhry; John A Dodson
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2019-10-14

7.  Sex Differences in 1-Year Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Melissa M Farmer; Maggie A Stanislawski; Mary E Plomondon; Bevanne Bean-Mayberry; Nataria T Joseph; Lauren E Thompson; Jessica L Zuchowski; Stacie L Daugherty; Elizabeth M Yano; P Michael Ho
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2017-05-12       Impact factor: 2.681

8.  TransRadial Education and Therapeutics (TREAT): shifting the balance of safety and efficacy of antithrombotic agents in percutaneous coronary intervention: a report from the Cardiac Safety Research Consortium.

Authors:  Connie N Hess; Sunil V Rao; David F Kong; Julie M Miller; Kevin J Anstrom; Olivier F Bertrand; Jean-Philippe Collet; Mark B Effron; Benjamin C Eloff; Emmanuel O Fadiran; Andrew Farb; Ian C Gilchrist; David R Holmes; Alice K Jacobs; Prashant Kaul; L Kristin Newby; David R Rutledge; Dale R Tavris; Thomas T Tsai; Roseann M White; Eric D Peterson; Mitchell W Krucoff
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Patterns of use and comparative effectiveness of bleeding avoidance strategies in men and women following percutaneous coronary interventions: an observational study from the National Cardiovascular Data Registry.

Authors:  Stacie L Daugherty; Lauren E Thompson; Sunghee Kim; Sunil V Rao; Sumeet Subherwal; Thomas T Tsai; John C Messenger; Frederick A Masoudi
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 24.094

10.  Gender disparity in cardiac procedures and medication use for acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  John T Nguyen; Alan K Berger; Sue Duval; Russell V Luepker
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-01-30       Impact factor: 4.749

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.