Literature DB >> 11545146

Sound-localization experiments with barn owls in virtual space: influence of interaural time difference on head-turning behavior.

I Poganiatz1, I Nelken, H Wagner.   

Abstract

Specific cues in a sound signal are naturally linked to certain parameters in acoustic space. In the barn owl, interaural time difference (ITD) varies mainly with azimuth, while interaural level difference (ILD) varies mainly with elevation. Previous data suggested that ITD is indeed the main cue for azimuthal sound localization in this species, while ILD is an important cue for elevational sound localization. The exact contributions of these parameters could be tested only indirectly because it was not possible to generate a stimulus that contained all relevant spatial information on the one hand, and allowed for a clean separation of these parameters on the other hand. Virtual auditory worlds offer this opportunity. Here we show that barn owls responded to azimuthal variations in virtual space in the same way as to variations in free-field stimuli. We interpret the increase of turning angle with sound-source azimuths (up to +/- 140 degrees) such that the owls did not experience front/back confusions with virtual stimuli. We then separated the influence of ITD from the influence of all other stimulus parameters by fixing the overall ITD in virtual stimuli to a constant value (+100 micros or +100 micros) while leaving all other sound characteristics unchanged. This manipulation influenced both azimuthal and elevational components of head arms. Since the owls' azimuthal head-turn amplitude always resembled the value signified by the ITD, these data demonstrated that azimuthal sound localization is influenced only by ITD both in the frontal hemisphere and in large parts of the rear hemisphere. ILDs did not have an influence on azimuthal components of head turns. While response latency to normal virtual stimuli was found to be largely independent of stimulus position, response delays of the head turns became longer if the ITD information pointed into a different hemisphere as the other cues of the sounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11545146      PMCID: PMC3201095          DOI: 10.1007/s101620010039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol        ISSN: 1438-7573


  23 in total

1.  The coding of spatial location by single units in the lateral superior olive of the cat. I. Spatial receptive fields in azimuth.

Authors:  Daniel J Tollin; Tom C T Yin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Sensitivity to interaural time difference and representation of azimuth in central nucleus of inferior colliculus in the barn owl.

Authors:  Peter Bremen; Iris Poganiatz; Mark von Campenhausen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-09-26       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Influence of the facial ruff on the sound-receiving characteristics of the barn owl's ears.

Authors:  Mark von Campenhausen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-05-24       Impact factor: 1.836

4.  Functional delay of myelination of auditory delay lines in the nucleus laminaris of the barn owl.

Authors:  Shih-Min Cheng; Catherine E Carr
Journal:  Dev Neurobiol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 3.964

5.  Auditory spatial tuning at the crossroads of the midbrain and forebrain.

Authors:  M Lucía Pérez; Sharad J Shanbhag; José Luis Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Variability reduction in interaural time difference tuning in the barn owl.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Masakazu Konishi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-05-28       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Target-approaching behavior of barn owls (Tyto alba): influence of sound frequency.

Authors:  Martin Singheiser; Dennis T T Plachta; Sandra Brill; Peter Bremen; Robert F van der Willigen; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-02-07       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Influence of double stimulation on sound-localization behavior in barn owls.

Authors:  Lutz Kettler; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2014-10-29       Impact factor: 1.836

9.  Improvements of sound localization abilities by the facial ruff of the barn owl (Tyto alba) as demonstrated by virtual ruff removal.

Authors:  Laura Hausmann; Mark von Campenhausen; Frank Endler; Martin Singheiser; Hermann Wagner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-05       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Multiplicative auditory spatial receptive fields created by a hierarchy of population codes.

Authors:  Brian J Fischer; Charles H Anderson; José Luis Peña
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.